From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix longstanding "error: storage size of '__mod_dmi_device_table' isn't known"
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:57:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090127155719.2b88da3f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090121225836.GA14105@x200.localdomain>
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:58:36 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> gcc 3.4.6 doesn't like MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(dmi, x) expansion enough to error out.
> Shut it up in a most simple way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> @@ -443,6 +443,13 @@ struct dmi_system_id {
> struct dmi_strmatch matches[4];
> void *driver_data;
> };
> +/*
> + * struct dmi_device_id appears during expansion of
> + * "MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(dmi, x)". Compiler doesn't look inside it
> + * but this is enough for gcc 3.4.6 to error out:
> + * error: storage size of '__mod_dmi_device_table' isn't known
> + */
> +#define dmi_device_id dmi_system_id
> #endif
>
> #define DMI_MATCH(a, b) { a, b }
I don't get it.
If code has
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(dmi, x);
and correctly includes mod_devicetable.h then that code will be
expanded and compiled happily by all compiler versions? Or not?
Under what circumstances does it fail? Presumably if some header files
weren't included? If so, why is that specific to a gcc version?
Or something else. I have no idea. Sigh. New changelog, please.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 22:58 [PATCH] Fix longstanding "error: storage size of '__mod_dmi_device_table' isn't known" Alexey Dobriyan
2009-01-27 23:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090127155719.2b88da3f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox