From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@kerlabs.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
cluster-devel@redhat.com, swhiteho@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] configfs: Silence lockdep on mkdir() and rmdir()
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:55:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090128035547.GE7244@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1229623218-8056-2-git-send-email-louis.rilling@kerlabs.com>
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 07:00:17PM +0100, Louis Rilling wrote:
> >From inside configfs it is not possible to serialize those recursive
> locking with a top-level one, because mkdir() and rmdir() are already
> called with inodes locked by the VFS. So using some
> mutex_lock_nest_lock() is not an option.
>
> I am proposing two solutions:
> 1) one that wraps recursive mutex_lock()s with
> lockdep_off()/lockdep_on().
> 2) (as suggested earlier by Peter Zijlstra) one that puts the
> i_mutexes recursively locked in different classes based on their
> depth from the top-level config_group created. This
> induces an arbitrary limit (MAX_LOCK_DEPTH - 2 == 46) on the
> nesting of configfs default groups whenever lockdep is activated
> but this limit looks reasonably high. Unfortunately, this also
> isolates VFS operations on configfs default groups from the others
> and thus lowers the chances to detect locking issues.
>
> Nobody likes solution 1), what I can understand.
Me too :-P
> This patch implements solution 2). However lockdep is still not happy with
> configfs_depend_item(). Next patch reworks the locking of
> configfs_depend_item() and finally makes lockdep happy.
<snip>
> #define CONFIGFS_ROOT 0x0001
> diff --git a/fs/configfs/dir.c b/fs/configfs/dir.c
> index 8e93341..f21be74 100644
> --- a/fs/configfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/configfs/dir.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static struct configfs_dirent *configfs_new_dirent(struct configfs_dirent * pare
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sd->s_links);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sd->s_children);
> sd->s_element = element;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> + sd->s_depth = -1;
> +#endif
> spin_lock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> if (parent_sd->s_type & CONFIGFS_USET_DROPPING) {
> spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> @@ -176,6 +179,17 @@ static int init_symlink(struct inode * inode)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> +static void configfs_set_dir_dirent_depth(struct configfs_dirent *parent_sd,
> + struct configfs_dirent *sd)
> +{
> + int parent_depth = parent_sd->s_depth;
> +
> + if (parent_depth >= 0)
> + sd->s_depth = parent_depth + 1;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static int create_dir(struct config_item * k, struct dentry * p,
> struct dentry * d)
> {
> @@ -187,6 +201,9 @@ static int create_dir(struct config_item * k, struct dentry * p,
> error = configfs_make_dirent(p->d_fsdata, d, k, mode,
> CONFIGFS_DIR | CONFIGFS_USET_CREATING);
> if (!error) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> + configfs_set_dir_dirent_depth(p->d_fsdata, d->d_fsdata);
> +#endif
> error = configfs_create(d, mode, init_dir);
> if (!error) {
> inc_nlink(p->d_inode);
Can you change this to provide non-lockdep versions of
functions? We don't want "#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP" everywhere. What we
want is the code to call functions unconditionally, and the functions to
do nothing if lockdep is not enabled. Like:
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
static inline void configfs_init_dir_dirent_depth(dirent)
{
dirent->s_depth = -1;
}
static void configfs_set_dir_dirent_depth(struct configfs_dirent *parent_sd,
struct configfs_dirent *sd)
{
int parent_depth = parent_sd->s_depth;
if (parent_depth >= 0)
sd->s_depth = parent_depth + 1;
}
#else
static inline void configfs_init_dir_dirent_depth(dirent)
{
}
static void configfs_set_dir_dirent_depth(struct configfs_dirent *parent_sd,
struct configfs_dirent *sd)
{
}
#endif
This makes the callsites much nicer to read:
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static struct configfs_dirent *configfs_new_dirent(struct configfs_dirent * pare
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sd->s_links);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sd->s_children);
sd->s_element = element;
+ configfs_init_dir_dirent_depth(sd);
spin_lock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
if (parent_sd->s_type & CONFIGFS_USET_DROPPING) {
spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
@@ -187,6 +201,7 @@ static int create_dir(struct config_item * k, struct dentry * p,
error = configfs_make_dirent(p->d_fsdata, d, k, mode,
CONFIGFS_DIR | CONFIGFS_USET_CREATING);
if (!error) {
+ configfs_set_dir_dirent_depth(p->d_fsdata, d->d_fsdata);
error = configfs_create(d, mode, init_dir);
if (!error) {
inc_nlink(p->d_inode);
Otherwise, this patch seems pretty straightforward.
Joel
--
Life's Little Instruction Book #30
"Never buy a house without a fireplace."
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-28 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-11 14:20 configfs, dlm_controld & lockdep Steven Whitehouse
2008-12-11 14:44 ` Louis Rilling
2008-12-11 17:34 ` Joel Becker
2008-12-12 10:06 ` Louis Rilling
2008-12-12 15:29 ` [PATCH] configfs: Silence lockdep on mkdir(), rmdir() and configfs_depend_item() Louis Rilling
2008-12-17 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-17 22:03 ` Joel Becker
2008-12-17 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-18 7:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-18 9:27 ` Joel Becker
2008-12-18 11:15 ` Louis Rilling
2008-12-18 18:00 ` Make lockdep happy with configfs Louis Rilling
2009-01-26 11:51 ` Louis Rilling
2009-01-28 3:44 ` Joel Becker
2008-12-18 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] configfs: Silence lockdep on mkdir() and rmdir() Louis Rilling
2009-01-28 3:55 ` Joel Becker [this message]
2009-01-28 10:38 ` Louis Rilling
2008-12-18 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] configfs: Rework configfs_depend_item() locking and make lockdep happy Louis Rilling
2009-01-28 4:13 ` Joel Becker
2009-01-28 10:32 ` Louis Rilling
2008-12-18 11:26 ` [PATCH] configfs: Silence lockdep on mkdir(), rmdir() and configfs_depend_item() Steven Whitehouse
2008-12-18 11:48 ` Louis Rilling
2008-12-18 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-18 12:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-18 22:58 ` Joel Becker
2008-12-19 10:29 ` Louis Rilling
2009-01-26 12:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 13:24 ` Louis Rilling
2009-01-26 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 14:00 ` Louis Rilling
2009-01-26 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 14:55 ` Louis Rilling
2009-01-28 3:05 ` Joel Becker
2009-01-28 3:41 ` Joel Becker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-28 18:18 [PATCH v2] Make lockdep happy with configfs Louis Rilling
2009-01-28 18:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] configfs: Silence lockdep on mkdir() and rmdir() Louis Rilling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090128035547.GE7244@mail.oracle.com \
--to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=louis.rilling@kerlabs.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox