From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: agraf@suse.de, Clemens Noss <cnoss@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 23 (kvm)
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:44:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090128124410.c203fab1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090128142616.GA4344@amt.cnet>
(cc mailing lists)
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:26:16 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:20:16AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> > On 28.01.2009, at 10:51, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:34:24 -0800 Randy Dunlap
> >> <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> News: I will be on leave next week, so there will probably be no
> >>>> linux-next release until Feb 2.
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes since 20090122:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> kvm changes cause this build error on i386:
> >>>
> >>> when kvm is built as module:
> >>> ERROR: "__moddi3" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined!
> >>>
> >>> or when kvm is built into the kernel image:
> >>> lapic.c:(.text+0x19276): undefined reference to `__moddi3'
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I guess it's this line:
> >>> ns = ktime_to_ns(remaining) % apic->timer.period;
> >>>
> >>
> >> dammit, I just spent N minutes hunting down the same thing in
> >> the Jan 26 linux-next :(
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, Clemens Foss posted a real fix on kvm@vger already.
Probably wasn't the best mailing list, as this bug affects all
developers and testers.. But whatever - thanks.
> commit efe4ff38b2bbc3944d0b2c9b6ec669b67cb7acbc
> Author: Clemens Noss <cnoss@gmx.de>
> Date: Mon Jan 26 02:55:16 2009 +0100
>
> KVM: x86: fix "__moddi3 undefined" build failure in lapic.c
>
> use mod_64 from arch/x86/kvm/i8254.c to fix
> ERROR: "__moddi3" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined!
>
> Signed-off-by: Clemens Noss <cnoss@gmx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index d8adc50..f0b67f2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,12 @@
> #include "kvm_cache_regs.h"
> #include "irq.h"
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_X86_64
> +#define mod_64(x, y) ((x) - (y) * div64_u64(x, y))
> +#else
> +#define mod_64(x, y) ((x) % (y))
> +#endif
> +
> #define PRId64 "d"
> #define PRIx64 "llx"
> #define PRIu64 "u"
> @@ -525,7 +531,7 @@ static u32 apic_get_tmcct(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
> if (ktime_to_ns(remaining) < 0)
> remaining = ktime_set(0, 0);
>
> - ns = ktime_to_ns(remaining) % apic->timer.period;
> + ns = mod_64(ktime_to_ns(remaining), apic->timer.period);
> tmcct = div64_u64(ns, (APIC_BUS_CYCLE_NS * apic->timer.divide_count));
>
> return tmcct;
Rather than cooking up a private implementation I think it would be
better to implement a kernel-wide mod64_u64() (?) facility and then to
use that in KVM. There will presumably be other sites which will (or
already do) need such a thing.
However it'll probably be a bit hard, getting the signednesses of the
args and the return value right.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-28 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-23 7:48 linux-next: Tree for January 23 Stephen Rothwell
2009-01-23 20:34 ` linux-next: Tree for January 23 (kvm) Randy Dunlap
2009-01-28 9:51 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-28 10:20 ` Alexander Graf
[not found] ` <20090128142616.GA4344@amt.cnet>
2009-01-28 20:44 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-04 13:55 ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-23 21:03 ` [PATCH] kmemtrace: fix printk format warnings Randy Dunlap
2009-01-23 21:21 ` linux-next: Tree for January 23 (drivers/watchdog/cpwd.c:411: error: 'inode' undeclared (first use in this function)) Alexey Dobriyan
2009-01-23 21:46 ` linux-next: Tree for January 23 (9pnet_rdma) Richard Holden
2009-01-23 23:00 ` [patch -next] 9pnet_rdma build error Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090128124410.c203fab1.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=cnoss@gmx.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox