From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752345AbZBAQdJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:33:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752204AbZBAQc4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:32:56 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:49172 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752162AbZBAQc4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:32:56 -0500 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:32:34 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Alan Cox , hpa@zytor.com, hch@lst.de, serue@us.ibm.com, "David C. Hansen" , Containers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sukadev@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] simple_set_mnt() should return void Message-ID: <20090201163234.GC3416@lst.de> References: <20090129063001.GA22898@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090129063001.GA22898@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -0.001 () BAYES_44 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:30:01PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:11:13 -0800 > Subject: [RFC][PATCH] simple_set_mnt() should return void > > simple_set_mnt() is defined to return int but always returns 0. > Callers assume simple_set_mnt() never fails and don't properly > cleanup if it were to _ever_ fail. For instance, get_sb_single() > and get_sb_nodev() should: > > up_write(sb->s_unmount); > deactivate_super(sb); > > if simple_set_mnt() fails. > > Since simple_set_mnt() never fails, would be cleaner if it did > not return anything. Makes sense to me. Feel free to resend once you did an allmodconfig or similar build.