From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754986AbZBAQd3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:33:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752204AbZBAQdR (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:33:17 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:49183 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752162AbZBAQdQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:33:16 -0500 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:33:01 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Alan Cox , hpa@zytor.com, hch@lst.de, serue@us.ibm.com, "David C. Hansen" , Containers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sukadev@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] devpts: Must release s_umount on error Message-ID: <20090201163301.GD3416@lst.de> References: <20090129063330.GB22898@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090129063330.GB22898@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -0.001 () BAYES_44 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:33:30PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu > Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:57:12 -0800 > Subject: [RFC][PATCH] devpts: Must release s_umount on error > > We should drop the ->s_umount mutex if an error occurs after the > sget()/grab_super() call. This was introduced when adding support > for multiple instances of devpts and noticed during a code review/reorg. Looks good and should probably be submitted for 2.6.29.