From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758197AbZBBScj (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:32:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752903AbZBBSca (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:32:30 -0500 Received: from outbound-mail-37.bluehost.com ([69.89.20.191]:51169 "HELO outbound-mail-37.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752775AbZBBSc3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:32:29 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User; b=uNJHCLw+SjCZKfyYDunxMk6FiwpW+5eKXCVHVziWhO7EjVvA9c65E5WN/LAGU//HaNbDW8wkj36qyXp/Ja25VcC70hV39Hvcxs/56YR4kg9pFR34OexS9ZgTELgXrGH+; From: Jesse Barnes To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] PCI PM: More refinements of suspend-resume framework Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:32:26 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux PCI , pm list , LKML References: <200902012229.27517.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200902012229.27517.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902021032.26819.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, February 1, 2009 1:29 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > After the recent discussion with Linus, I have the following three fixes of > the PCI PM framework. > > The first patch fixes the bug that bridges (and PCIe ports) are disabled > during suspend, althouth they shouldn't. > > The second one makes the PCI PM core handle devices more carefully (details > in the changelog). [Note to Linus: devices are still put into low power > states with interrupts on after this patch. Moving that to the late > suspend phase will be the next step.] > > The last patch makes the warning in pci_legacy_suspend() more useful. Linus, do you want these as part of the next pull request? If so, I'll check them out, pull them in, and let them run the linux-next build gauntlet for a day before sending them. Otherwise I'll just send a pull request today with the 8 or so fixes I have queued now. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center