From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] create workqueue threads only when needed
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:32:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090202113235.GB5757@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4986B205.2040807@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:42:45AM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 03:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:37:41AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I don't know, most of those I've looked on are not documented about the reason
> >> > > for a private workqueue. I guess most of them can use the usual kevent.
>
> I rather suspect that the majority of private workqueues are there for
> good reasons.
>
> >> > The main problem with kevent is that it gets clogged up.
> >>
> >> I don't think so. Here is a snapshot of the workqueue tracer in my
> >> box currently:
> >
> > That's not quite what I meant ...
> >
> > The main problem with keventd I'd say is that it's used in all sort of
> > exeptional code path (ie, driver reset path, error handling, etc...) for
> > things that will msleep happily for tenth milliseconds, that sort of
> > thing.
> >
> > IE. It will be pretty responsive -in general- but can suffer form
> > horrible latencies every now and then.
>
> Actually it /should/ be the other way around:
>
> The shared workqueue should only be used for work that sleeps only
> briefly (perhaps with the exception of very unlikely longer sleeps e.g.
> for allocations that cause paging).
>
> Work which /may/ sleep longer, for example performs SCSI transactions,
> needs to go into a private workqueue or other kind of context.
Right. But most of the time, these workqueues receive few events.
That's why async looks a good alternative for such cases. The threads
from async core which perform the jobs are created and destroyed on the fly,
depending on the number of jobs queued.
> OTOH you are right too; work which must not be deferred too long by work
> from another uncooperative/ unfair subsystem is probably also better off
> in an own workqueue...
Or callsites which use kevent and may sleep for too long could be identified
and fixed...
> Stefan Richter
> -=====-==--= --=- ---=-
> http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-02 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-27 0:17 [RFC][PATCH] create workqueue threads only when needed Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-27 0:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-31 18:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-31 18:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-31 18:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-01 16:22 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-01 17:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-01 17:40 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-01 17:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-01 18:06 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-01 18:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-01 21:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 2:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-02 6:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 8:42 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-02 9:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 9:14 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-02-02 9:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-02 10:03 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-02-02 20:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 9:54 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-02-02 11:39 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-02 11:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-02-02 11:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-02 5:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-02 6:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 9:01 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-02 14:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
[not found] ` <20090126162807.1131c777.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2009-01-27 1:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-27 8:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-27 3:07 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2009-01-27 8:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-27 12:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-02 14:49 ` Daniel Walker
2009-02-02 14:51 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-02-02 15:40 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090202113235.GB5757@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox