From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757406AbZBBRxZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:53:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752827AbZBBRxQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:53:16 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]:22437 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752808AbZBBRxP (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:53:15 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Amqx95UXXZL6pGSTR6sUEc5jmyzcJ+R92q4oheqVIVgQFGTtKDFENFPvh+k4L4TaAI F4hZK9COTcNJGIetuGAHfhi904ltW6AYu99h3bihaMXHKXOYHpq56YIqUC0HJhph5AwX h9LzYq6WbH4xBv5m8Wci7BtAV18QyvfXo6Q8s= Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:53:12 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput , Ingo Molnar , x86 maintainers , Andrew Morton , Sam Ravnborg , David Miller , LKML , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] fix headers_check warnings Message-ID: <20090202175312.GB7479@localhost> References: <1233593765.3244.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090202172159.GA7479@localhost> <1233595855.28370.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4987321A.1020404@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4987321A.1020404@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [H. Peter Anvin - Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:49:14AM -0800] | Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: | >> | >> Hi Jaswinder, | >> | >> it seems we have a clash here :) I thought this part | >> was just dropped out | >> | >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/461 | >> | >> and Peter had been applying it on tip:x86/header-fixes | >> | >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/549 | >> | >> but maybe it's just lost... | > | > No, you cannot remove sys_arch_prctl otherwise you will get sparse | > warning like this: | > | > CHECK arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:833:6: warning: symbol 'sys_arch_prctl' was not declared. Should it be static? | > | | Perhaps we can just move this prototype to . | | -hpa | | -- | H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center | I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. | Hmm... For internal use we refer to do_arch_prctl and sys_arch_prctl supposed to be syscall wrapper. Yes, Peter, you're right! It seems this call was missed there. -Cyrill-