public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Henriques <henrix@sapo.pt>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26.8-rt15
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:06:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090202190625.GA7742@hades.domain.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233387250.922.52.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 02:34:10AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the 2.6.26.8-rt15 tree which can be
> downloaded from the following location:
> 
>   http://rt.et.redhat.com/download/
> 
> Information on the RT patch can be found at:
> 
>   http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page

I'm having compilation issues with this new patch.  Here's the error I got:

In file included from
/root/lmcorrei/linux/linux-2.6.26.8-rt15/kernel/sched.c:1701:
/root/lmcorrei/linux/linux-2.6.26.8-rt15/kernel/sched_rt.c: In
function 'inc_rt_tasks':
/root/lmcorrei/linux/linux-2.6.26.8-rt15/kernel/sched_rt.c:434: error:
'struct rq' has no member named 'online'

Now, function in question has the following code:

static inline
void inc_rt_tasks(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
        WARN_ON(!rt_prio(rt_se_prio(rt_se)));
        rt_rq->rt_nr_running++;
#if defined CONFIG_SMP || defined CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
        if (rt_se_prio(rt_se) < rt_rq->highest_prio) {
                struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq);
                rt_rq->highest_prio = rt_se_prio(rt_se);

                if (rq->online)
                        cpupri_set(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq->cpu,
                                   rt_se_prio(rt_se));
        }
#endif

The issue is that the 'online' member is actually defined only if CONFIG_SMP is
enabled and in my config I do not have it but I have CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED.

I am not sending any patch because I actually do not know what is the best way
to solve this issue since I am not (yet!) a sched expert.  However, I forsee two
possible solutions:

 1. Nest another #ifdef inside the first one, so that the code is only compiled
    when CONFIG_SMP option is set (which will result in ugly code)
 2. Define 'online' member in structure outside of the CONFIG_SMP (which, I
    believe, is not an optimal solution)

Regards,
-- 
Luis Henriques


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-02 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-31  7:34 2.6.26.8-rt15 Steven Rostedt
2009-02-02 19:06 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
     [not found]   ` <498707870200005A00044F86@sinclair.provo.novell.com>
2009-02-02 19:53     ` 2.6.26.8-rt15 Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090202190625.GA7742@hades.domain.com \
    --to=henrix@sapo.pt \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox