From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip 1/3] trace: better manage the context info for events
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:09:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090203090902.GA23466@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902022128130.2192@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:32:51PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:29:21PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Impact: make trace_event more convenient for tracers
> > >
> > > All tracers (for the moment) that use the struct trace_event want to
> > > have the context info printed before their own output: the pid/cmdline,
> > > cpu, and timestamp.
> > >
> > > But some other tracers that want to implement their trace_event
> > > callbacks will not necessary need these information or they may want to
> > > format them as they want.
> > >
> > > This patch adds a new default-enabled trace option:
> > > TRACE_ITER_CONTEXT_INFO When disabled through:
> > >
> > > echo nocontext-info > /debugfs/tracing/trace_options
> > >
> > > The pid, cpu and timestamps headers will not be printed.
> > >
> > > IE with the sched_switch tracer with context-info (default):
> > >
> > > bash-2935 [001] 100.356561: 2935:120:S ==> [001] 0:140:R <idle>
> > > <idle>-0 [000] 100.412804: 0:140:R + [000] 11:115:S events/0
> > > <idle>-0 [000] 100.412816: 0:140:R ==> [000] 11:115:R events/0
> > > events/0-11 [000] 100.412829: 11:115:S ==> [000] 0:140:R <idle>
> > >
> > > Without context-info:
> > >
> > > 2935:120:S ==> [001] 0:140:R <idle>
> > > 0:140:R + [000] 11:115:S events/0
> > > 0:140:R ==> [000] 11:115:R events/0
> > > 11:115:S ==> [000] 0:140:R <idle>
> > >
> > > A tracer can disable it at runtime by clearing the bit
> > > TRACE_ITER_CONTEXT_INFO in trace_flags.
> > >
> > > The print routines were renamed to trace_print_context and
> > > trace_print_lat_context, so that they can be used by tracers if they
> > > want to use them for one of the trace_event callbacks.
> >
> >
> > Actually, I wonder if this is not breaking the sense of the TRACE_ITER_CONTEXT_INFO
> > flag.
>
> Yeah, I agree with Frederic here. Let the user decide this as a global
> flag for about of data to print. The tracer should just provide a callback
> incase the tracer has a different context format.
>
> >
> > In the first patch I made about it, I thought this flag was to decide whether we want to
> > print the context information in the standard way.
> >
> > Then, Steven suggested to actually provide callbacks for the tracers which want
> > to override the standard context information printer.
> > The flag then got more logical: TRACE_ITER_CONTEXT_INFO was not only about deciding
> > whether we want or not the standard context info, it tells if we want in a global way
> > the context info to be printed, whatever how the tracer decides to print it.
> > (This is the theory, but since we couldn't override the bin/raw/hex cases, the
> > practical case didn't follow this idea).
> >
> > If someone doesn't want to see these informations in the blk tracer, this flag will
> > not help him. Worst, it will double print the context info if the user enables the flag.
> >
> > Now that I see the practical case, I'm not sure the design of my patch was valuable.
> > A tracer has to play with the flag if it wants to override the context info in
> > the bin/raw/hex cases. And I don't think this is a good way to proceed.
> >
> > In my opinion, the ITER_CONTEXT_INFO flag should mostly be set by the user.
>
> I think it should _only_ be set by user.
>
> >
> > And only one callback could be added to trace_event: context_info()
> > Then, the tracer will manage itself the raw/hex/bin/normal cases inside
> > this callback.
>
> Yeah, this is a good idea. The callback can be passed an enum to what kind
> of trace it is: TRACE_FMT_RAW TRACE_FMT_HEX ...
>
>
> >
> > We can provide the default callbacks available for the tracers which want it and even
> > one function which proceed all of them, depending on the flags.
> > ftrace/preempt/sched.... tracers can register this function for their context_info callback
> > and other tracers too if they want.
> >
> > Or they can override it, and even pick the default callbacks for dedicated flags when they want.
> >
> > Then, when the user wants the context info to be printed or not, he just have to
> > set/clear the context-info flag manually.
> >
> > A tracer can even decide to set/clear it by default, but for its real sense: print or not
> > these context info.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> I'm not sure a tracer should decide if it should have the format or not.
> In its context callback, it might decide there. But if the user does not
> want it, it should be off.
Of course, I just thought that some tracers could choose if it's default enabled
or disabled when they are selected.
>
> Unless you are saying have the tracer decide if it is enabled on or off
> when the trace is selected?
Exactly, I meant that printing the context can be mostly relevant for several tracers
(ftrace, sched) but can be encumbering for some other traces (mmiotrace).
So perhaps a tracer could touch this flag when it's selected
and restore its value when unselected.
Or perhaps we can provide a pair of functions to do it in a proper way...
> -- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-02 22:29 [PATCH tip 1/3] trace: better manage the context info for events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-02-03 2:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-03 2:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-03 9:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-02-03 12:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-02-03 21:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-03 21:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-02-03 22:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-03 12:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-02-03 13:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-02-03 12:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-02-03 21:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-03 13:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 13:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090203090902.GA23466@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox