From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] RFC: ACPI: Interface for ACPI drivers to place quirk code which gets executed early
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:08:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902031408.12237.trenn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090202202246.GA9023@dreamland.darkstar.lan>
On Monday 02 February 2009 21:22:46 Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Il Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 06:22:10PM +0100, Thomas Renninger ha scritto:
> > These two patches are tested on a ASUS machine and worked as expected,
> > but probably may still need some cleanup.
>
> I'd keep the DMI+HID approach since it's more flexible:
> - (AFAICS) Thinkpads have different methods for hwmon depending on the
> model and no fixed HID
> - With DMI it would be possible to include ASUS motherboards (ATK w/
> hwmon) but exclude ASUS laptops (ATK w/o hwmon).
I thought the ATK01[01]0 devices are ASUS specific.
I now found an ATK0100 (not the ATK0110 this is about) on a Sony and a
Samsung.
I still wonder why you want to restrict the check to ASUS.
Your ATK0110 driver would also load on any other machine which has such
a device. And why shouldn't a Samsung/Sony/... machine with a ATK0110
device not access the hwmon sensor through it?
Should we already look a bit deeper into the ATK0110 device in the quirk
to make sure it provides thermal, fan or other hwmon device accessing
functionality?
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index c54d7b6..1c25747 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > #include <linux/kthread.h>
> >
> > #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
> > +#include "acpi.h"
> >
> > #define _COMPONENT ACPI_BUS_COMPONENT
> > ACPI_MODULE_NAME("scan");
> > @@ -1562,6 +1563,8 @@ static int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> >
> > if (result)
> > acpi_device_unregister(acpi_root, ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_NORMAL);
> > + else
> > + acpi_device_quirks();
>
> Hum, it's not immediatly clear why you put that call in the else
> branch. Maybe put:
>
> if (!result)
> acpi_device_quirks();
>
> before the cleanup?
Yes that looks ugly, yours is nicer...
Also thanks for the "auto not handled properly" hint, I forgot
that part.
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-25 21:05 [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources Luca Tettamanti
2009-01-26 8:37 ` Hans de Goede
2009-01-29 10:30 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 15:16 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-01-29 16:29 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 18:58 ` Hans de Goede
2009-01-29 21:31 ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-30 14:29 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-01 21:22 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 9:11 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-02 11:38 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] RFC: ACPI: Interface for ACPI drivers to place quirk code which gets executed early Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 20:22 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-03 13:08 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2009-02-03 13:45 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-03 14:19 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-04 13:37 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] RFC: ACPI: Set enforce_resources to strict if a ATK0110 device is found in namespace Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 20:29 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 11:38 ` [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 21:15 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-04 5:52 ` Len Brown
2009-02-04 6:05 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-04 8:37 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-04 13:17 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-04 13:26 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-04 14:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-10 13:57 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-10 14:08 ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-10 15:32 ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-10 16:24 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-27 13:27 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-24 12:39 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-24 13:21 ` Hans de Goede
2009-03-24 13:43 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-24 14:29 ` Hans de Goede
2009-03-29 20:16 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-29 20:33 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-29 20:55 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-29 22:01 ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-30 7:36 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-02 22:59 ` Len Brown
2009-04-03 9:40 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-12 12:44 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-02 22:45 ` polling (Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources) Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902031408.12237.trenn@suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=kronos.it@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox