From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
t-sato@yk.jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] Allow SysRq emergency thaw to thaw frozen filesystems
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:21:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090203142118.ed4d8e3e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4988C00A.2040904@redhat.com>
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:07:06 -0600
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:55:18 -0600
> > Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> (this version fixes a couple small issues raised by Randy Dunlap)
> >> (and adds sb_lock locking I forgot, as akpm pointed out)
> >> (Randy's CONFIG_BLOCK fix should still apply over this)
> >
> > <converts it to a delta so I can see what you did>
>
> Sorry, didn't know if you want deltas on top of old patches or new
> respun patches. Guess now I know :)
There's no easy answer. For new reviewers/testers, the whole patch is better.
But for people who reviewed/tested the earlier patch, the delta is
better.
So a replacement patch is usually OK. I will turn it into a delta with
a flick of the wrist and those people who I cc'ed on the patch (and
mm-commits subscribers) will get to see the delta.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-15 4:06 [PATCH] Allow SysRq emergency sync to thaw frozen filesystems Eric Sandeen
2009-01-16 0:20 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 3:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-01-16 3:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-01-16 15:33 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-16 15:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-01-16 16:21 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-01-16 16:42 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-01-16 8:48 ` Pavel Machek
2009-01-16 15:17 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-16 15:28 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-01-16 15:33 ` Pavel Machek
2009-01-16 15:40 ` Theodore Tso
2009-01-16 15:52 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-16 16:08 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-01-16 19:31 ` [PATCH V2] Allow SysRq emergency thaw " Eric Sandeen
2009-01-16 19:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-16 19:46 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-01-16 19:50 ` [PATCH V3] " Eric Sandeen
2009-01-30 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-02 22:55 ` [PATCH V4] " Eric Sandeen
2009-02-03 11:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-02-03 13:31 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-02-03 21:21 ` Dave Chinner
2009-02-03 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-03 22:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-02-03 22:21 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-16 22:01 ` [PATCH V5] " Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090203142118.ed4d8e3e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=t-sato@yk.jp.nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox