From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754314AbZBCTo4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:44:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752484AbZBCTor (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:44:47 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:51800 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752334AbZBCTor (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:44:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:42:14 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: do_each_pid_task() needs rcu lock Message-ID: <20090203194214.GA23703@redhat.com> References: <20090203193904.GA23695@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090203193904.GA23695@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/03, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > "ftrace: use struct pid" commit 978f3a45d9499c7a447ca7615455cefb63d44165 > converted ftrace_pid_trace to "struct pid*". But we can't use > do_each_pid_task() without rcu_read_lock() even if we know the pid > itself can't go away (it was pinned in ftrace_pid_write). The exiting > task can detach itself from this pid at any moment. Q: why do we use do_each_pid_task(PIDTYPE_PID) ? We can never have more than 1 task in the loop. Perhaps, static void set_ftrace_pid(struct pid *pid) { struct task_struct *p; rcu_read_lock(); p = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID); if (p) set_tsk_trace_trace(p); rcu_read_unlock(); } looks better? Oleg.