From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752685AbZBDFE3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 00:04:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750804AbZBDFEU (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 00:04:20 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:55545 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750755AbZBDFET (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 00:04:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:03:34 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Thomas Renninger Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, mark.langsdorf@amd.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] CPUFREQ: ondemand/conservative: deprecate sampling_rate{min,max} Message-Id: <20090203210334.a99354ee.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1233679606-1971-3-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> References: <1233679606-1971-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <1233679606-1971-3-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:46:41 +0100 Thomas Renninger wrote: > static ssize_t show_sampling_rate_max(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) > { > + printk(KERN_INFO "CPUFREQ: conservative sampling_rate_max " > + "sysfs file is deprecated - used by: %s\n", current->comm); > return sprintf (buf, "%u\n", MAX_SAMPLING_RATE); > } I'd have thought that the user-irritation risk here is pretty high. Would it make sense to throttle these or to make them once-per-boot or something?