public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: mark.langsdorf@amd.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CPUFREQ: Ondemand and powernow-k8 enhancements/fixes/cleanups
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:21:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090203212106.GK10486@codemonkey.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233679606-1971-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de>

On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:46:39PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
 > These are the same I sent out some days ago, but messed up the
 > cpufreq list address.
 > 
 > The patches are based against Dave's cpufreq git tree's fixes branch.

'fixes' is for stuff pending for .29, which this patchset seems out
of scope for.  Unfortunatly, there's a ton of checkpatch cleanups up
the 'next' branch which makes this impossible to apply.

Can you rediff against that branch please?
 
thanks,

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-03 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-03 16:46 CPUFREQ: Ondemand and powernow-k8 enhancements/fixes/cleanups Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] CPUFREQ: Introduce /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/cpuinfo_transition_latency Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 2/7] CPUFREQ: ondemand/conservative: deprecate sampling_rate{min,max} Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04  5:03   ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] CPUFREQ: ondemand/conservative: sanitize sampling_rate restrictions Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04  5:07   ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 10:07     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 4/7] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Get transition latency from ACPI _PSS table Thomas Renninger
2009-02-08 18:35   ` Robert Hancock
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 5/7] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Always compile powernow-k8 driver with ACPI support Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 6/7] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Only print error message once, not per core Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04  5:09   ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04  9:59     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 7/7] ACPI: cpufreq: Remove deprecated /proc/acpi/processor/../performance proc entries Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04  5:13   ` Len Brown
2009-02-03 16:48 ` CPUFREQ: Ondemand and powernow-k8 enhancements/fixes/cleanups Dave Jones
2009-02-03 21:21 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2009-02-03 23:29   ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 23:44     ` Dave Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090203212106.GK10486@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox