From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755213AbZBCVVU (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:21:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751721AbZBCVVL (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:21:11 -0500 Received: from testure.choralone.org ([194.9.77.134]:42541 "EHLO testure.choralone.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750963AbZBCVVL (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:21:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:21:06 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: Thomas Renninger Cc: mark.langsdorf@amd.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CPUFREQ: Ondemand and powernow-k8 enhancements/fixes/cleanups Message-ID: <20090203212106.GK10486@codemonkey.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Thomas Renninger , mark.langsdorf@amd.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1233679606-1971-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1233679606-1971-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:46:39PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > These are the same I sent out some days ago, but messed up the > cpufreq list address. > > The patches are based against Dave's cpufreq git tree's fixes branch. 'fixes' is for stuff pending for .29, which this patchset seems out of scope for. Unfortunatly, there's a ton of checkpatch cleanups up the 'next' branch which makes this impossible to apply. Can you rediff against that branch please? thanks, Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk