From: Harald Braumann <harry@unheit.net>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: sean finney <seanius@seanius.net>,
Gustavo Noronha <kov@debian.org>,
debian-devel@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cgroup mount point
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:18:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090204011804.08f2b35a@sbs173> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830902031540ra4e00dejd844d584b0668a6e@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 696 bytes --]
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:40:39 -0800
Paul Menage <menage@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Harald Braumann <harry@unheit.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > So, what's the problem with /dev/cgroups then? If shm/ and pts/
> > are allowed under /dev, wouldn't it be discriminating against
> > cgroups/, to not allow it there?
>
> Right, that's what I proposed a couple of emails earlier in this
> thread.
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you'd be against it, on the contrary,
I took your explanation as another argument for using /dev and
against /sys (/cgroups should not even be considered, IMHO).
The question was targeted at those, who oppose it.
Cheers,
harry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090202200013.GU3643@vespa.holoscopio.com>
[not found] ` <1233606371.15779.32.camel@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
[not found] ` <20090202205246.GA28593@glandium.org>
2009-02-02 21:41 ` cgroup mount point Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-02-02 22:54 ` Chris Friesen
2009-02-02 23:43 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-02-03 3:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-02-03 5:06 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-02-06 6:17 ` Balbir Singh
2009-02-03 10:24 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-02-03 12:30 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-02-03 13:26 ` Daniel P. Berrange
[not found] ` <87ljsnzo4v.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
2009-02-03 12:57 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-02-04 3:59 ` Ben Finney
2009-02-03 14:38 ` Gustavo Noronha
2009-02-03 16:55 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-03 18:49 ` Mike Hommey
2009-02-03 18:51 ` sean finney
2009-02-03 19:14 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-03 23:38 ` Harald Braumann
2009-02-03 23:40 ` Paul Menage
2009-02-04 0:18 ` Harald Braumann [this message]
2009-02-04 9:16 ` Josselin Mouette
2009-02-05 21:19 ` José Luis Tallón
2009-02-06 22:00 ` Harald Braumann
2009-02-03 15:03 ` Gabor Gombas
2009-02-03 16:19 ` Bill Nottingham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090204011804.08f2b35a@sbs173 \
--to=harry@unheit.net \
--cc=debian-devel@lists.debian.org \
--cc=kov@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=seanius@seanius.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox