From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: travis@sgi.com, mingo@redhat.com, davej@redhat.com,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] work_on_cpu: Use our own workqueue.
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:36:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090204073636.30f15339.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902042111.35543.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:11:35 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 February 2009 13:31:11 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:14:31 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> > > I think you're right though: smp_call_function_single (or neat wrappers)
> > > where possible, work_on_cpu which can fail for the others, and we'll just
> > > have to plumb in the error returns.
> >
> > I bet a lot of those can use plain old schedule_work_on().
>
> Which is where work_on_cpu started: a little wrapper around schedule_work_on.
>
> We're going in circles, no?
No, we've made some progress. We have a better understanding of what
the restrictions, shortcomings and traps are in this stuff. We've
learned (surprise!) that a one-size-fits-all big hammer wasn't such a
great idea.
Proposed schedule_work_on() rule: either the flush_work() caller or the
callback should not hold any explicit or implicit sleeping locks.
Quick scan:
arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c:native_machine_shutdown()
I think this can/should continue to use set_cpus_allowed().
Although it could be converted to schedule_work_on(), as long as the
scheduler is still working properly at this time.
x86 microcode:
This code is just nuts. What's the point in pinning itself to a
CPU for the act of loading the microcode into main memory? It's only
the loading of the microcode which should care about which CPU
executes the code. ie: apply_microcode().
The code needs some laundering, switch to schedule_work_on().
Ensure that the callback functions don't take microcode_mutex.
arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c:
It's a kernel thread. Add kthread_bind() to caller, done.
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c:
Switch to rdmsr_on_cpu() and friends
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
Could get similar treatment (needs new cpuid_on_cpu()?). Looks
like schedule_work_on() would be OK to use as well.
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c
Use rdmsr_on_cpu().
arch/blackfin/kernel/ipipe.c
Use kthread_bind()
arch/arm/mach-integrator/cpu.c
Not sure.
arch/sparc/kernel/us3_cpufreq.c
Use smp_call_function_single(). Write sparc64_get_clock_tick_on_cpu().
arch/sparc/kernel/us2e_cpufreq.c
Ditto
arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c
If sun4v_mmustat_info() can be called from interrupt, use
smp_call_function_single(). Otherwise schedule_work_on().
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtasd.c
Ditto
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
Ditto
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
Blah. Looks like schedule_work_on() will be OK.
arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
NFI what this does
arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c
schedule_work_on()
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/sn_hwperf.c
schedule_work_on()
arch/ia64/kernel/salinfo.c:
schedule_work_on()
arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c:
schedule_work_on()
arch/ia64/kernel/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:
schedule_work_on()
mm/pdflush.c:
wtf what the heck is all that stuff and who added it? weird.
Leave it alone I guess. Can admins manually move kernel threads to
other CPUs?
mm/vmscan.c:
switch to kthread_bind()
net/sunrpc/svc.c:
switch to kthread_bind()
kernel/kmod.c:
switch to kthreads, write then switch to kthread_bind_mask().
drivers/firmware/dcdbas.c:
smp_call_function_single()
drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_main.c:
kthread_bind()
drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:
already done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-16 19:11 [PATCH 0/3] cpu freq: fix problems with work_on_cpu usage in acpi-cpufreq Mike Travis
2009-01-16 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] work_on_cpu: dont try to get_online_cpus() in work_on_cpu Mike Travis
2009-01-16 19:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] work_on_cpu: Use our own workqueue Mike Travis
2009-01-24 8:15 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <200901261711.43943.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2009-01-26 7:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 17:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 18:35 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 20:43 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-26 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 21:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 21:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 23:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-27 0:42 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 21:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 23:01 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-27 0:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-27 7:15 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-27 17:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-27 7:05 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-27 7:25 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-27 15:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-27 16:51 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-28 13:02 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-28 17:19 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-28 17:32 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-29 10:39 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-28 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-29 1:43 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-29 2:12 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-30 6:03 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-30 6:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-30 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-30 17:08 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-30 21:59 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-30 22:17 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-02 12:35 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-03 4:06 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 2:44 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-04 3:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 10:41 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-04 15:36 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-04 21:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 21:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 23:45 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-05 12:19 ` Pavel Machek
2009-02-05 17:44 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-02-10 8:54 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-10 9:35 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-11 0:32 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-16 19:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: use work_on_cpu in acpi-cpufreq.c for drv_read and drv_write Mike Travis
2009-01-16 23:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] cpu freq: fix problems with work_on_cpu usage in acpi-cpufreq [PULL request] Mike Travis
2009-01-17 22:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 17:11 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-19 17:26 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090204073636.30f15339.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox