From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758996AbZBEBCd (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:02:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755086AbZBEBCX (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:02:23 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54593 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754040AbZBEBCW (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2009 20:02:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:02:32 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , Chuck Ebbert , Domenico Andreoli , Willy Tarreau , Rodrigo Rubira Branco , Jake Edge , Eugene Teo , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Risto Suominen Subject: Re: [patch 07/41] fbdev/atyfb: Fix DSP config on some PowerMacs & PowerBooks Message-ID: <20090205000232.GA363@suse.de> References: <20090204184029.881610776@mini.kroah.org> <20090204184602.GH25246@kroah.com> <1233791475.4612.24.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1233791475.4612.24.camel@pasglop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:51:15AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 10:46 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > plain text document attachment > > (fbdev-atyfb-fix-dsp-config-on-some-powermacs-powerbooks.patch) > > 2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > My only possible worry with that one is the first generation clamshell > iBook which uses a Mobility M1 chip, for which we haven't had anybody > testing whether this would break it or not ... > > So if anybody with such a machine is reading this, please holler... But this patch is already in Linus's tree, so why would you worry about this? thanks, greg k-h