From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755873AbZBEXvZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:51:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753131AbZBEXvR (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:51:17 -0500 Received: from smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.65.185]:37483 "HELO smtp126.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753014AbZBEXvQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 18:51:16 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=EsnwZVP+BNUYIpc85G6SuekBrUXQrUs5ob37Qe3uPsh7KKh8WKe2XUnhku9VzSzo15zsl7fT1MOYfTO9H7WgMqi0tTAaVA9XFwP/Pq1BrRDUxN1oUkWo4skYVwC3qKgh8jXk0NtwI5cDq0YqgpSBr87HpN31Brmeni3yjasSPng= ; X-YMail-OSG: stcfbucVM1nq7FwweFySE99kjuBeE9_yJ_CZuAaRmQCrVLVaAZarNDhPjxqypByg461E8Q33Rd9QR1niCv86cM6KwrslNUjkp_qLV6sGzltbNBT37q2W6xSpJWmjsARI4mtY3tgzBW_Ytgej9lHe0ot6Bu8N.GRFWk.j9HE_M62iz.5uMQOLQKB4FAFN X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: Bryan Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] Blackfin SPI Driver: ensure cache coherency before doing DMA Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:51:13 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Andrew Morton , Mike Frysinger , spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vitja Makarov References: <1226994760-4301-1-git-send-email-cooloney@kernel.org> <200811201405.06811.david-b@pacbell.net> <386072610902050130k27c6d7far752ac49183bf36ae@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <386072610902050130k27c6d7far752ac49183bf36ae@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902051551.14146.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 05 February 2009, Bryan Wu wrote: > As you acked this patchset, is that possible to merge it? > Or need Andrew to keep them in -mm for a while. ISTR *NOT* acking the whole series though. In fact, I recall giving a generic NAK part way through because of patches that didn't include comments (after manually NAKing many individual patches) and ones where $SUBJECT didn't match the patch comments. Plus even a few which seemed to be wrong. (And I've said the same thing about Blackfin patches before, too. Please help the message get through to your co-workers: make sure the patches come with useful public descriptions.) At this point, best to resend the whole series, with the updates I requested. The few patches which I did ack can include that ack. - Dave