public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: tom.leiming@gmail.com, kay.sievers@vrfy.org,
	cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe_done(v3)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:08:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090205180856.GA20805@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090204170858.2d07b546@infradead.org>

On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 05:08:58PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:08:51 -0800
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:52:24AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:48:35 +0800
> > > tom.leiming@gmail.com wrote:
> > > 
> > > > From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
> > > > 
> > > > This patch adds a function : driver_wait_probe_done,
> > > > which waits on condition of probing done to replace
> > > > polling for driver_probe_done in fs initialization.
> > > > 
> > > > There is no better way to avoid polling for
> > > > driver_probe_done _and_ existence of the root device,
> > > > so we does not replace the driver_probe_done with
> > > > driver_wait_probe_done in such special case.
> > > > 
> > > > Removing polling in fs initialization may lead to
> > > > a faster boot.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > ok this one will work fine ;)
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > thanks for fixing this up 
> > > (it will clash with the patch that moves this to one place, but the
> > > same cleanup can be done there)
> > 
> > What patch is that?  Should i be taking this?  Or are they in some
> > other tree?
> 
> it's the suspend-resume regression fixes that either you already have
> or that raphael sent to you

Hm, ok, I don't see any left in my tree, or queue, so perhaps someone
might want to resend them to me?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-05 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-30 12:48 [PATCH] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe_done(v3) tom.leiming
2009-01-30 13:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2009-01-30 14:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-04 23:08   ` Greg KH
2009-02-05  1:08     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-05 18:08       ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-02-17  1:14         ` Ming Lei
2009-02-17  3:19           ` Greg KH
2009-02-17  4:07             ` Ming Lei
2009-02-17  4:12               ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090205180856.GA20805@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox