From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754888AbZBGBrU (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:47:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752547AbZBGBrM (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:47:12 -0500 Received: from outbound-mail-29.bluehost.com ([69.89.17.211]:42221 "HELO outbound-mail-29.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752376AbZBGBrL (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:47:11 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User; b=PIHeCoYozzSpHBqTipna3ip5QPto32Yku3flNzDeYsXmPCPghS7jlYyRd4w6ocm6EPByMBMoI3Qa3R7R4tdPqlIk9IlpYIDgU8F+KJqycutAMertPuQ//JJkj6Y2dYK3; From: Jesse Barnes To: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: [Bug #12608] 2.6.29-rc powerpc G5 Xorg legacy_mem regression Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:47:04 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List References: <200902061445.11379.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902061747.05153.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box128.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - virtuousgeek.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, February 6, 2009 4:50 pm Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Yeah that should work. I always hated this code (well most of X > > actually); we could probably clean up the logic a little. If this works > > I'll send it out to the Xorg list for review. > > Yes, thanks for restructuring it, I was rather itching to do so. > > With the one small change below which I think you'll approve, > your patch works for me on the G5 - but I've not tested it on > other (x86) machines which were already working. Heh, yeah thanks. Ok I'll get it into X. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center