From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753443AbZBHNkW (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:40:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751872AbZBHNkI (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:40:08 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:38357 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751330AbZBHNkH (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 08:40:07 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Paul Collins , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:39:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29-rc2-tst; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <87prihcepl.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> <87k58nda87.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> <874oz5pmvd.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> In-Reply-To: <874oz5pmvd.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902081439.31548.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 08 February 2009, Paul Collins wrote: > Paul Collins writes: > > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > > > >> On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Paul Collins wrote: > >>> Got a couple of these on a PowerBook running 2.6.29-rc2 either during > >>> suspend or resume -- it's hard to tell. (The suspend message is > >>> timestamped in syslog with the time I resumed, so I guess it was > >>> buffered along with the subsequent "Badness" messages.) > >> > >> Please check if the patch from http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/13/144 fixes the > >> problem for you. > > > > It does not fix the problem. > > I'm also getting this warning since 2.6.28.1, which incorporated commit > 1c5745aa380efb6417b5681104b007c8612fb496 ("sched_clock: prevent > scd->clock from moving backwards, take #2") as commit > e268dcdd404f4558cdd24c8ecede3e064df8fa33, this being the patch that > introduced the WARN_ON(timekeeping_suspended) check. Hm, I thought the timekeeping suspend problem was fixed in this commit. Ingo?