From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hch@infradead.org,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
john@johnmccutchan.com, rlove@rlove.org,
malware-list@lists.printk.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH -v1 02/11] fsnotify: add group priorities
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:15:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090209211532.8985.3927.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090209211525.8985.13887.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com>
In preperation for blocking fsnotify calls group priorities must be added.
When multiple groups request the same event type the lowest priority group
will receive the notification first.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
---
fs/notify/group.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/group.c b/fs/notify/group.c
index a877929..d7cabe5 100644
--- a/fs/notify/group.c
+++ b/fs/notify/group.c
@@ -49,8 +49,21 @@ void fsnotify_recalc_global_mask(void)
static void fsnotify_add_group(struct fsnotify_group *group)
{
- list_add_rcu(&group->group_list, &fsnotify_groups);
+ int priority = group->priority;
+ struct fsnotify_group *group_iter;
+
group->evicted = 0;
+ list_for_each_entry(group_iter, &fsnotify_groups, group_list) {
+ /* insert in front of this one? */
+ if (priority < group_iter->priority) {
+ /* I used list_add_tail() to insert in front of group_iter... */
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&group->group_list, &group_iter->group_list);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* apparently we need to be the last entry */
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&group->group_list, &fsnotify_groups);
}
void fsnotify_get_group(struct fsnotify_group *group)
@@ -98,14 +111,16 @@ void fsnotify_put_group(struct fsnotify_group *group)
}
}
-static struct fsnotify_group *fsnotify_find_group(unsigned int group_num, __u64 mask, const struct fsnotify_ops *ops)
+static struct fsnotify_group *fsnotify_find_group(unsigned int priority, unsigned int group_num,
+ __u64 mask, const struct fsnotify_ops *ops)
{
struct fsnotify_group *group_iter;
struct fsnotify_group *group = NULL;
list_for_each_entry_rcu(group_iter, &fsnotify_groups, group_list) {
- if (group_iter->group_num == group_num) {
+ if (group_iter->priority == priority) {
if ((group_iter->mask == mask) &&
+ (group_iter->group_num == group_num) &&
(group_iter->ops == ops)) {
fsnotify_get_group(group_iter);
group = group_iter;
@@ -121,7 +136,8 @@ static struct fsnotify_group *fsnotify_find_group(unsigned int group_num, __u64
* the allocation and the initialization, but this is only called when notification
* systems make changes, so why make it more complex?
*/
-struct fsnotify_group *fsnotify_obtain_group(unsigned int group_num, __u64 mask, const struct fsnotify_ops *ops)
+struct fsnotify_group *fsnotify_obtain_group(unsigned int priority, unsigned int group_num,
+ __u64 mask, const struct fsnotify_ops *ops)
{
struct fsnotify_group *group, *tgroup;
@@ -131,13 +147,14 @@ struct fsnotify_group *fsnotify_obtain_group(unsigned int group_num, __u64 mask,
atomic_set(&group->refcnt, 1);
+ group->priority = priority;
group->group_num = group_num;
group->mask = mask;
group->ops = ops;
mutex_lock(&fsnotify_grp_mutex);
- tgroup = fsnotify_find_group(group_num, mask, ops);
+ tgroup = fsnotify_find_group(priority, group_num, mask, ops);
/* we raced and something else inserted the same group */
if (tgroup) {
mutex_unlock(&fsnotify_grp_mutex);
diff --git a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
index 98ffcd6..e156df5 100644
--- a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
+++ b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ struct fsnotify_group {
const struct fsnotify_ops *ops; /* how this group handles things */
+ unsigned int priority; /* order this group should receive msgs. low first */
unsigned int evicted :1; /* has this group been evicted? */
/* groups can define private fields here */
@@ -129,7 +130,7 @@ extern void fsnotify(struct inode *to_tell, __u64 mask, void *data, int data_is)
/* called from fsnotify interfaces, such as fanotify or dnotify */
extern void fsnotify_recalc_global_mask(void);
-extern struct fsnotify_group *fsnotify_obtain_group(unsigned int group_num, __u64 mask, const struct fsnotify_ops *ops);
+extern struct fsnotify_group *fsnotify_obtain_group(unsigned int priority, unsigned int group_num, __u64 mask, const struct fsnotify_ops *ops);
extern void fsnotify_put_group(struct fsnotify_group *group);
extern void fsnotify_get_group(struct fsnotify_group *group);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-09 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-09 21:15 [PATCH -v1 01/11] fsnotify: unified filesystem notification backend Eric Paris
2009-02-09 21:15 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2009-02-09 21:15 ` [PATCH -v1 03/11] fsnotify: add in inode fsnotify markings Eric Paris
2009-02-12 21:57 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-17 17:26 ` Eric Paris
2009-02-09 21:15 ` [PATCH -v1 04/11] fsnotify: parent event notification Eric Paris
2009-02-09 21:15 ` [PATCH -v1 05/11] dnotify: reimplement dnotify using fsnotify Eric Paris
2009-02-09 21:15 ` [PATCH -v1 06/11] fsnotify: generic notification queue and waitq Eric Paris
2009-02-09 21:15 ` [PATCH -v1 07/11] fsnotify: include pathnames with entries when possible Eric Paris
2009-02-09 21:16 ` [PATCH -v1 08/11] fsnotify: add correlations between events Eric Paris
2009-02-09 21:16 ` [PATCH -v1 09/11] fsnotify: fsnotify marks on inodes pin them in core Eric Paris
2009-02-09 21:16 ` [PATCH -v1 10/11] fsnotify: handle filesystem unmounts with fsnotify marks Eric Paris
2009-02-09 21:16 ` [PATCH -v1 11/11] inotify: reimplement inotify using fsnotify Eric Paris
2009-02-09 21:28 ` [PATCH -v1 00/11] fsnotify: unified filesystem notification backend Eric Paris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090209211532.8985.3927.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=john@johnmccutchan.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malware-list@lists.printk.net \
--cc=rlove@rlove.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox