From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] trace: provide correct return value after outputting the event.
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:06:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090210150624.GG5836@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234245785-14526-1-git-send-email-wenji.huang@oracle.com>
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:03:05AM -0500, Wenji Huang wrote:
> This patch is to make the function early return once failure and give
> correct return value in case of success.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@oracle.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> index 782ec0f..519a0ca 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> @@ -186,30 +186,30 @@ verif_pid(struct trace_seq *s, pid_t pid, int cpu, pid_t *last_pids_cpu)
> ret = trace_seq_printf(s,
> " ------------------------------------------\n");
> if (!ret)
> - TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> + return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
>
> ret = print_graph_cpu(s, cpu);
> if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE)
> - TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> + return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
>
> ret = print_graph_proc(s, prev_pid);
> if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE)
> - TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> + return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
>
> ret = trace_seq_printf(s, " => ");
> if (!ret)
> - TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> + return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
>
> ret = print_graph_proc(s, pid);
> if (ret == TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE)
> - TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> + return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
>
> ret = trace_seq_printf(s,
> "\n ------------------------------------------\n\n");
> if (!ret)
> - TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
> + return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE;
>
> - return ret;
> + return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED;
> }
>
> static struct ftrace_graph_ret_entry *
> --
> 1.5.6
>
How could I have forgotten the return statements here...?
Anyway, the three patches look good.
Thanks!
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-10 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-10 6:03 [PATCH 2/3] trace: provide correct return value after outputting the event Wenji Huang
2009-02-10 15:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090210150624.GG5836@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wenji.huang@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox