Re: [PATCH 0/7] git pull request for tip/tracing/ftace

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> Ingo,
> 
> The following is based off of tip/tracing/ftrace.
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> The following patches are in:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> 
>     branch: tip/tracing/ftrace
> 
> 
> Lai Jiangshan (2):
>       ring_buffer: fix typing mistake
>       ring_buffer: fix ring_buffer_read_page()
> 
> Steven Rostedt (1):
>       tracing, x86: fix constraint for parent variable
> 
> Tobias Klauser (1):
>       tracing: storage class should be before const qualifier
> 
> Wenji Huang (3):
>       tracing: remove unneeded variable
>       tracing: provide correct return value after outputting the event
>       tracing: fix typos in comments
> 
> ----
>  arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c             |    9 +++---
>  include/linux/ring_buffer.h          |    2 +-
>  kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c           |   46 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  kernel/trace/trace.c                 |    2 +-
>  kernel/trace/trace_branch.c          |    4 +--
>  kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c |   14 +++++-----
>  kernel/trace/trace_hw_branches.c     |    2 +-
>  kernel/trace/trace_sysprof.c         |    2 +-
>  8 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

Pulled into tip:tracing/ftrace, thanks Steve!

Note, i cherry-picked this fix into tip:tracing/urgent:

  9666578: tracing, x86: fix constraint for parent variable

As in theory GCC can miscompile the function-return-tracer, right?

	Ingo