From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756748AbZBLGB0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:01:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750896AbZBLGBQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:01:16 -0500 Received: from smtp125.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.65.184]:42059 "HELO smtp125.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750764AbZBLGBP (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:01:15 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=TNjzvrBlKciC2qPDKgF5j04oYPqu++VW5c31Pgpb71Hy2J6V9P+Af8WNpFDcC8TcdwBxXyLRNeTGhiDyzp3xnrDCBASE7AO2nAfrXxLjR2dH45u+BwB7dhU/x24NnBL31DokokStlCKeEu4DG+t+5PtPck64GOdn60PMN1TOdEw= ; X-YMail-OSG: gqizJskVM1m7oIOQdbeQrlngaXJ6BqQ_OpLNMl8V.UcB.UjFW.kMwQB9UZFi.0uL7cZR2mF.SoZXKy4.3SJkiKv5t_4SJNS1ZffCxHUIi_yhZ8mfWiIBigxwpThgtD1YZ_hm2OLWNnf7jE6YW2LEDYlTKcmX.7R5Lu8hlkZzUzownReGSnLLaOgzeo8X X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: musb: tweak musb_read_fifo() to avoid unused warnings Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:01:12 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: me@felipebalbi.com, Bryan Wu , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1233915736-18506-1-git-send-email-cooloney@kernel.org> <20090206191558.GD10711@frodo> <8bd0f97a0902061124s3c44d39dmf306a44f0c16528d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0902061124s3c44d39dmf306a44f0c16528d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902112201.12902.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 06 February 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Is this patch avoiding a warning about these variables being unused ? > > > > Would be nice to get this info to the patch body ;-) > > the subject already says that Not enough. Mike, why is it that patches from ADI generally don't include patch descriptions? It's not like folk haven't asked for them... In the case of "avoid a warning" patches, the convention is to have the patch summary include the warnings being avoided. (Or at least a few, if they're too numerous.)