From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, x86@firstfloor.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [3/10] x86: MCE: Always use separate work queue to run trigger
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:37:22 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090212123722.4B00E3E6672@basil.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090212137.750180365@firstfloor.org>
Impact: Needed for bug fix in next patch
This relaxes the requirement that mce_notify_user has to run in process
context. Useful for future changes, but also leads to cleaner
behaviour now. Now instead mce_notify_user can be called directly
from interrupt (but not NMI) context.
The work queue only uses a single global work struct, which can be done safely
because it is always free to reuse before the trigger function is executed.
This way no events can be lost.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_64.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_64.c 2009-02-12 11:30:51.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_64.c 2009-02-12 12:10:21.000000000 +0100
@@ -380,11 +380,17 @@
schedule_delayed_work(&mcheck_work, next_interval);
}
+static void mce_do_trigger(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ call_usermodehelper(trigger, trigger_argv, NULL, UMH_NO_WAIT);
+}
+
+static DECLARE_WORK(mce_trigger_work, mce_do_trigger);
+
/*
- * This is only called from process context. This is where we do
- * anything we need to alert userspace about new MCEs. This is called
- * directly from the poller and also from entry.S and idle, thanks to
- * TIF_MCE_NOTIFY.
+ * Notify the user(s) about new machine check events.
+ * Can be called from interrupt context, but not from machine check/NMI
+ * context.
*/
int mce_notify_user(void)
{
@@ -394,9 +400,14 @@
unsigned long now = jiffies;
wake_up_interruptible(&mce_wait);
- if (trigger[0])
- call_usermodehelper(trigger, trigger_argv, NULL,
- UMH_NO_WAIT);
+
+ /*
+ * There is no risk of missing notifications because
+ * work_pending is always cleared before the function is
+ * executed.
+ */
+ if (trigger[0] && !work_pending(&mce_trigger_work))
+ schedule_work(&mce_trigger_work);
if (time_after_eq(now, last_print + (check_interval*HZ))) {
last_print = now;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-12 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-12 12:37 [PATCH] [0/10] x86: MCE: machine check bug fix series Andi Kleen
2009-02-12 12:37 ` [PATCH] [1/10] x86: MCE: Reinitialize per cpu features on resume v3 Andi Kleen
2009-02-12 12:37 ` [PATCH] [2/10] x86: MCE: Don't disable machine checks during code patching Andi Kleen
2009-02-12 12:37 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-02-12 12:37 ` [PATCH] [4/10] x86: MCE: Switch machine check polling to per CPU timer v3 Andi Kleen
2009-02-13 5:27 ` Tim Hockin
2009-02-12 12:37 ` [PATCH] [5/10] x86: MCE: Don't set up mce sysdev devices with mce=off Andi Kleen
2009-02-12 12:37 ` [PATCH] [6/10] x86: MCE: Disable machine checks on offlined CPUs Andi Kleen
2009-02-12 12:37 ` [PATCH] [7/10] x86: MCE: Disable machine checks on suspend v2 Andi Kleen
2009-02-12 12:37 ` [PATCH] [8/10] x86: MCE: Use force_sig_info to kill process in machine check Andi Kleen
2009-02-12 12:37 ` [PATCH] [9/10] x86: MCE: Fix a race condition in mce_read() Andi Kleen
2009-02-12 12:37 ` [PATCH] [10/10] x86: MCE: Fix ifdef for 64bit thermal apic vector clear on shutdown Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-12 12:39 [PATCH] [0/10] x86: MCE: machine check bug fix series Andi Kleen
2009-02-12 12:39 ` [PATCH] [3/10] x86: MCE: Always use separate work queue to run trigger Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090212123722.4B00E3E6672@basil.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@firstfloor.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox