From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759515AbZBLPb6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:31:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757951AbZBLPbt (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:31:49 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:33347 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757742AbZBLPbs (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:31:48 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:31:46 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: John Ogness , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, malware-list@lists.printk.net, eparis@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/5] VFS: DazukoFS, stackable-fs, file access control Message-ID: <20090212153146.GG28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <8663jrgwo4.fsf@johno.fn.ogness.net> <861vufgwlt.fsf@johno.fn.ogness.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:27:14PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > This ought to be done better in light of the problem that one > could issue `mount -t dazukofs /mnt /opt` > In kernel code, I'm thinking something like > > static int foofs_dothis(...) > { > buf = call d_path on sb->s_root Call what on what? There is no such thing as the mountpoint of superblock.