From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] generic-smp: remove single ipi fallback for smp_call_function_many()
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:32:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090212223750.295581470@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090212223200.979433820@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: smp-many-fallback.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7674 bytes --]
In preparation of removing the kmalloc() calls from the generic-ipi code
get rid of the single ipi fallback for smp_call_function_many().
Because we cannot get around carrying the cpumask in the data -- imagine
2 such calls with different but overlapping masks -- put in a full mask.
Also, since we cannot simply remove an item from the global queue (another
cpu might be observing it), a quiesence of sorts needs to be observed. The
current code uses regular RCU for that purpose.
However, since we'll be wanting to quickly reuse an item, we need something
with a much faster turn-around. We do this by simply observing the global
queue quiesence. Since there are a limited number of elements, it will auto
force a quiecent state if we wait for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/smp.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/smp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/smp.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/smp.c
@@ -12,8 +12,22 @@
#include <linux/smp.h>
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct call_single_queue, call_single_queue);
-static LIST_HEAD(call_function_queue);
-__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(call_function_lock);
+
+static struct {
+ struct list_head queue;
+ spinlock_t lock;
+ /*
+ * mini-RCU state machine
+ *
+ * @counter counts the number of entries on the queue, and @quiesent
+ * is a sequence count incremented every time the queue is idle.
+ */
+ unsigned int counter;
+ unsigned int quiesent;
+} call_function __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = {
+ .queue = LIST_HEAD_INIT(call_function.queue),
+ .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(call_function.lock),
+};
enum {
CSD_FLAG_WAIT = 0x01,
@@ -25,8 +39,11 @@ struct call_function_data {
struct call_single_data csd;
spinlock_t lock;
unsigned int refs;
- struct rcu_head rcu_head;
- unsigned long cpumask_bits[];
+ union {
+ struct rcu_head rcu_head;
+ unsigned int stamp;
+ };
+ struct cpumask cpumask;
};
struct call_single_queue {
@@ -107,17 +124,16 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt
* It's ok to use list_for_each_rcu() here even though we may delete
* 'pos', since list_del_rcu() doesn't clear ->next
*/
- rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(data, &call_function_queue, csd.list) {
- int refs;
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(data, &call_function.queue, csd.list) {
+ int refs, busy = 0;
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits)))
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &data->cpumask))
continue;
data->csd.func(data->csd.info);
spin_lock(&data->lock);
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits));
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &data->cpumask);
WARN_ON(data->refs == 0);
data->refs--;
refs = data->refs;
@@ -126,9 +142,13 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt
if (refs)
continue;
- spin_lock(&call_function_lock);
+ spin_lock(&call_function.lock);
list_del_rcu(&data->csd.list);
- spin_unlock(&call_function_lock);
+ if (!--call_function.counter)
+ call_function.quiesent++;
+ else
+ busy = 1;
+ spin_unlock(&call_function.lock);
if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT) {
/*
@@ -138,10 +158,17 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt
smp_wmb();
data->csd.flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
}
- if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_ALLOC)
- call_rcu(&data->rcu_head, rcu_free_call_data);
+ if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK) {
+ smp_wmb();
+ data->csd.flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
+ }
+ if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_ALLOC) {
+ if (busy)
+ call_rcu(&data->rcu_head, rcu_free_call_data);
+ else
+ kfree(data);
+ }
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
put_cpu();
}
@@ -302,6 +329,8 @@ void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu,
arch_send_call_function_ipi(*(maskp))
#endif
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct call_function_data, cfd_data);
+
/**
* smp_call_function_many(): Run a function on a set of other CPUs.
* @mask: The set of cpus to run on (only runs on online subset).
@@ -323,14 +352,14 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
{
struct call_function_data *data;
unsigned long flags;
- int cpu, next_cpu;
+ int cpu, next_cpu, me = smp_processor_id();
/* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled */
WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
/* So, what's a CPU they want? Ignoring this one. */
cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
- if (cpu == smp_processor_id())
+ if (cpu == me)
cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
/* No online cpus? We're done. */
if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
@@ -338,7 +367,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
/* Do we have another CPU which isn't us? */
next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
- if (next_cpu == smp_processor_id())
+ if (next_cpu == me)
next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(next_cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
/* Fastpath: do that cpu by itself. */
@@ -347,31 +376,40 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
return;
}
- data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data) + cpumask_size(), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (unlikely(!data)) {
- /* Slow path. */
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- if (cpu == smp_processor_id())
- continue;
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
- smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
- }
- return;
+ data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (data)
+ data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC;
+ else {
+ data = &per_cpu(cfd_data, me);
+ /*
+ * We need to wait for all previous users to go away.
+ */
+ while (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)
+ cpu_relax();
+ /*
+ * Then we need to wait for the queue to pass through a
+ * quiesent state, so that no other cpus can observe the
+ * element anymore.
+ */
+ while (data->stamp == call_function.quiesent)
+ cpu_relax();
+ data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_LOCK;
}
spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
- data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC;
if (wait)
data->csd.flags |= CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
data->csd.func = func;
data->csd.info = info;
- cpumask_and(to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits), mask, cpu_online_mask);
- cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits));
- data->refs = cpumask_weight(to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits));
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&call_function_lock, flags);
- list_add_tail_rcu(&data->csd.list, &call_function_queue);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&call_function_lock, flags);
+ cpumask_and(&data->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &data->cpumask);
+ data->refs = cpumask_weight(&data->cpumask);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&call_function.lock, flags);
+ call_function.counter++;
+ data->stamp = call_function.quiesent;
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&data->csd.list, &call_function.queue);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&call_function.lock, flags);
/*
* Make the list addition visible before sending the ipi.
@@ -379,7 +417,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct
smp_mb();
/* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
- arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(to_cpumask(data->cpumask_bits));
+ arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(&data->cpumask);
/* optionally wait for the CPUs to complete */
if (wait)
@@ -413,20 +451,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function);
void ipi_call_lock(void)
{
- spin_lock(&call_function_lock);
+ spin_lock(&call_function.lock);
}
void ipi_call_unlock(void)
{
- spin_unlock(&call_function_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&call_function.lock);
}
void ipi_call_lock_irq(void)
{
- spin_lock_irq(&call_function_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&call_function.lock);
}
void ipi_call_unlock_irq(void)
{
- spin_unlock_irq(&call_function_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&call_function.lock);
}
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-12 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-12 22:32 [PATCH 0/2] generic smp helpers vs kmalloc Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-12 22:32 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-02-14 14:41 ` [PATCH 1.5/2] generic-smp: fix initial quiesent count Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-14 14:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-14 21:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-14 23:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-12 22:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] generic-smp: remove kmalloc usage Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-14 14:46 ` [PATCH 2.5/2] generic-smp: remove cfd rcu_head Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090212223750.295581470@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox