From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764377AbZBNBry (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:47:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762554AbZBNBQ7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:16:59 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:50709 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762741AbZBNBQr (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:16:47 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:13:56 -0800 From: Greg KH To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Cc: Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , Chuck Ebbert , Domenico Andreoli , Willy Tarreau , Rodrigo Rubira Branco , Jake Edge , Eugene Teo , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Andreas Herrmann , Ingo Molnar Subject: [patch 47/48] x86: microcode_amd: fix wrong handling of equivalent CPU id Message-ID: <20090214011356.GV17706@kroah.com> References: <20090214010805.419403436@mini.kroah.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline; filename="x86-microcode_amd-fix-wrong-handling-of-equivalent-cpu-id.patch" In-Reply-To: <20090214011208.GA17706@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2.6.28-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. ------------------ From: Andreas Herrmann commit 3c763fd77e66e55d029052da31df0abd9920cb1e upstream. Impact: fix bug resulting in non-loaded AMD microcode mc_header->processor_rev_id is a 2 byte value. Similar is true for equiv_cpu in an equiv_cpu_entry -- only 2 bytes are of interest. Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 23 ++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct microcode_header_amd { unsigned int mc_patch_data_checksum; unsigned int nb_dev_id; unsigned int sb_dev_id; - unsigned char processor_rev_id[2]; + u16 processor_rev_id; unsigned char nb_rev_id; unsigned char sb_rev_id; unsigned char bios_api_rev; @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cp while (equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu != 0) { if (current_cpu_id == equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu) { - equiv_cpu_id = equiv_cpu_table[i].equiv_cpu; + equiv_cpu_id = equiv_cpu_table[i].equiv_cpu & 0xffff; break; } i++; @@ -137,21 +137,10 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cp return 0; } - if ((mc_header->processor_rev_id[0]) != (equiv_cpu_id & 0xff)) { - printk(KERN_ERR - "microcode: CPU%d patch does not match " - "(patch is %x, cpu extended is %x) \n", - cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id[0], - (equiv_cpu_id & 0xff)); - return 0; - } - - if ((mc_header->processor_rev_id[1]) != ((equiv_cpu_id >> 16) & 0xff)) { - printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d patch does not match " - "(patch is %x, cpu base id is %x) \n", - cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id[1], - ((equiv_cpu_id >> 16) & 0xff)); - + if (mc_header->processor_rev_id != equiv_cpu_id) { + printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d patch does not match " + "(processor_rev_id: %x, eqiv_cpu_id: %x)\n", + cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id, equiv_cpu_id); return 0; }