From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754910AbZBONle (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:41:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753895AbZBONl0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:41:26 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:59781 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753867AbZBONlZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 08:41:25 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:41:15 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett To: Jean Delvare Cc: Shem Multinymous , Frank Seidel , linux kernel , akpm@linux-foundation.org, rlove@rlove.org, protasnb@gmail.com, Michael Ruoss , Dmitry Torokhov , Tim Gardner , Frank Seidel Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon/hdaps: Fix bug 7154 inversion of separate axis Message-ID: <20090215134115.GA21670@srcf.ucam.org> References: <499569A9.5030202@suse.de> <41840b750902141632l5c4bd705m1b528900466a25fd@mail.gmail.com> <20090215102707.174e770f@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090215102707.174e770f@hyperion.delvare> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vavatch.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:27:07AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:32:02 -0500, Shem Multinymous wrote: > > See the table at the bottom of the tp_smapi page > > (http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Tp_smapi), or hdaps.c inside the > > tp_smapi package, for more model-specific information. > > It would be nice if you made the interface (constants and their > > meaning) the same as in the tp_smapi version of hdaps, which is > > already widely deployed and packaged by several distros. > > Why is this code not upstream? Ah yeah, I remember now: because it was > written by an anonymous developer, which makes the contribution legally > dubious. Copying such code into the upstream version of hdaps would be > no different, so we cannot do that, sorry. You're arguing that sysfs interfaces are copyrightable? -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org