From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi-gpio: Sanitize MISO bitvalue
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:58:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902161158.48890.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902151630.41426.mb@bu3sch.de>
On Sunday 15 February 2009, Michael Buesch wrote:
> gpio_get_value() returns 0 or nonzero, but getmiso() expects 0 or 1.
> Sanitize the value to a 0/1 boolean.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>
> Well, we could also change the bitbang helpers in linux/spi/spi_bitbang.h
That would be the main alternate fix to consider, and
it's worth updating the docs there to specify that getmiso()
needs to return 0/1 ...
> or change the way the gpio_get_value API is defined,
Not an option. The more instructions thrown in these
inner loops, the harder it is to get even inlined code to
clock over 1 MHz.
> but I personally think
> this patch is pretty good as is.
> In any case, it fixes a real bug on platforms like the bcm47xx which
> return 0 or nonzero for gpio_get_value.
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/spi/spi_gpio.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/spi/spi_gpio.c 2009-02-14 21:37:14.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/spi/spi_gpio.c 2009-02-15 16:27:16.000000000 +0100
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static inline void setmosi(const struct
>
> static inline int getmiso(const struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> - return gpio_get_value(SPI_MISO_GPIO);
> + return !!gpio_get_value(SPI_MISO_GPIO);
> }
>
> #undef pdata
>
> --
> Greetings, Michael.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-16 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-15 15:30 [PATCH] spi-gpio: Sanitize MISO bitvalue Michael Buesch
2009-02-16 19:58 ` David Brownell [this message]
2009-02-18 21:04 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-18 21:52 ` Michael Buesch
2009-02-19 0:29 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902161158.48890.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox