From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754258AbZBPQUp (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:20:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751717AbZBPQUf (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:20:35 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:34843 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750996AbZBPQUe (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:20:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:09:33 -0800 From: Greg KH To: David Vrabel Cc: Linus Torvalds , Kernel development list Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] UWB and WUSB fixes Message-ID: <20090216160933.GA5008@kroah.com> References: <49873632.6040108@csr.com> <20090203051244.GA1826@kroah.com> <49885139.3070106@csr.com> <20090203154745.GA27533@kroah.com> <49997EF2.4070109@csr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49997EF2.4070109@csr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:57:54PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > > > Also, it would be good to have the linux-usb developers at least review > > any changes to these files, myself included, right? > > I'll post patches to the list if I think they're significant enough to > need a review. They should all be posted to the linux-usb list please. > > It shouldn't be any more work for you, just send the patches to me and > > forget about them, I'll queue them up at the proper time :) > > To be honest, in the past you have been too slow to handle patches and > review in a timely manner. The current system of sending pull request > direct to Linus has worked well so I'm going to stick with it for now. Things were slow when we were handling a 30+ patchset full of the whole wusb system. Smaller patches get handled within a week, and I've not had any complaints about that in a while (musb withstanding, but that's a total mess for other reasons...) So again, I'd really like at least the ability to review the patches, which in your current development flow, isn't even possible. thanks, greg k-h