From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Mike Murphy <mamurph@cs.clemson.edu>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: xpad.c - Xbox 360 wireless and sysfs support
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:13:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090216161331.GB5008@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5aa163d00902160522r3a22412je3f5202076f57a0a@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 08:22:05AM -0500, Mike Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> wrote:
> ...
> >
> > 1. You need to check the returns of sscanf
>
> Will add... this is currently preliminary and not very well tested.
>
> > 2. This is very ugly:
> >
> > +/* read-only attrs */
> > +static ssize_t xpad_show_int(struct xpad_data *xd, struct xpad_attribute *attr,
> > + char *buf)
> > +{
> > + int value;
> > + if (!strcmp(attr->attr.name, "controller_number"))
> > + value = xd->controller_number;
> > + else if (!strcmp(attr->attr.name, "pad_present"))
> > + value = xd->pad_present;
> > + else if (!strcmp(attr->attr.name, "controller_type"))
> > + value = xd->controller_type;
> > + else
> > + value = 0;
> > + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", value);
> > +}
>
> The above code is basically following the example in
> samples/kobject/kset-example.c. I broke the rest of the sysfs stuff
> out such that it uses separate functions for show/store, which
> definitely looks cleaner. However, given the large amount of code that
> results, I'm starting to think that re-factoring and pulling the sysfs
> code out to a separate file might be useful.
>
> >
> > 3. Possible memory leak in error case:
> >
> > +static struct xpad_data *xpad_create_data(const char *name, struct kobject *parent) {
> > + struct xpad_data *data = NULL;
> > + int check;
> > +
> > + data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!data)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + check = kobject_init_and_add(&data->kobj, &xpad_ktype, parent, "%s", name);
> > + if (check) {
> > + kobject_put(&data->kobj);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> >
>
> My understanding from Documentation/kobject.txt is that the
> kobject_put in the 2nd error check will set the kobj's reference
> counter to zero, eventually causing the kobject core to call my
> cleanup function for the ktype (xpad_release) and free the memory.
That is correct.
The bigger question is why are you using a struct kobject in the first
place? As you are a device, just use a struct device. What are you
trying to do in sysfs here to make you want to use a "raw" kobject in a
driver?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-16 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-15 4:08 [PATCH] input: xpad.c - Xbox 360 wireless and sysfs support Mike Murphy
2009-02-16 8:31 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-02-16 13:22 ` Mike Murphy
2009-02-16 15:21 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-02-19 4:04 ` Mike Murphy
2009-02-16 16:13 ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-02-16 18:09 ` Mike Murphy
2009-02-16 18:59 ` Greg KH
2009-02-16 19:30 ` Mike Murphy
2009-02-16 20:22 ` Greg KH
2009-02-17 2:53 ` Mike Murphy
2009-02-17 3:18 ` Greg KH
2009-02-17 4:57 ` Mike Murphy
2009-02-17 18:27 ` Mike Murphy
2009-02-17 18:39 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090216161331.GB5008@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mamurph@cs.clemson.edu \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox