From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
ego@in.ibm.com
Cc: balbir@in.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, efault@gmx.de,
andi@firstfloor.org, Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] sched: Fix the wakeup nomination for sched_mc/smt_power_savings.
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:21:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090216165111.12804.41620.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090216164719.12804.37013.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com>
The existing algorithm to nominate a preferred wake up cpu would not
work on a machine which has both sched_mc_power_savings and
sched_smt_power_savings enabled. On such machines, the nomination at a lower
level would keep overwriting the nominations by it's peer-level as well as
higher level sched_domains. This would lead to the ping-ponging of the
nominated wake-up cpu, thereby preventing us from effectively consolidating
tasks.
Correct this by defining the authorized nomination sched_domain level, which
is either the highest sched_domain level containing the
SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE flag or a lower level which contains the previously
nominated wake-up cpu in it's span.
Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 06c5c6c..9827297 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -776,6 +776,7 @@ enum powersavings_balance_level {
};
extern int sched_mc_power_savings, sched_smt_power_savings;
+extern enum powersavings_balance_level active_power_savings_level;
enum sched_domain_level {
SD_LV_NONE = 0,
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 52bbf1c..af88f5a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -520,6 +520,11 @@ struct root_domain {
* low system utilisation. Triggered at POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP(2)
*/
unsigned int sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu;
+ /*
+ * The sched-domain level which is authorized to nominate the preferred
+ * wake up cpu.
+ */
+ enum sched_domain_level authorized_nomination_level;
#endif
};
@@ -3397,9 +3402,17 @@ out_balanced:
goto ret;
if (this == group_leader && group_leader != group_min) {
+ struct root_domain *my_rd = cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd;
*imbalance = min_load_per_task;
- if (sched_mc_power_savings >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP) {
- cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu =
+ /*
+ * The preferred wakeup cpu should be nominated by power-aware
+ * sched-domains which contain the currently nominated cpu.
+ */
+ if (sd->level == my_rd->authorized_nomination_level ||
+ (sd->level < my_rd->authorized_nomination_level &&
+ cpu_isset(my_rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu,
+ *sched_domain_span(sd)))) {
+ my_rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu =
cpumask_first(sched_group_cpus(group_leader));
}
return group_min;
@@ -3683,7 +3696,8 @@ redo:
!test_sd_parent(sd, SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE))
return -1;
- if (sched_mc_power_savings < POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP)
+ if (active_power_savings_level <
+ POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP)
return -1;
if (sd->nr_balance_failed++ < 2)
@@ -7192,6 +7206,7 @@ static void sched_domain_node_span(int node, struct cpumask *span)
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
int sched_smt_power_savings = 0, sched_mc_power_savings = 0;
+enum powersavings_balance_level active_power_savings_level;
/*
* The cpus mask in sched_group and sched_domain hangs off the end.
@@ -7781,6 +7796,25 @@ static int __build_sched_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map,
err = 0;
+/* Assign the sched-domain level which can nominate preferred wake-up cpu */
+ rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu = UINT_MAX;
+ rd->authorized_nomination_level = SD_LV_NONE;
+
+ if (active_power_savings_level >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP) {
+ struct sched_domain *sd;
+ enum sched_domain_level authorized_nomination_level =
+ SD_LV_NONE;
+
+ for_each_domain(first_cpu(*cpu_map), sd) {
+ if (!(sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE))
+ continue;
+ authorized_nomination_level = sd->level;
+ }
+
+ rd->authorized_nomination_level = authorized_nomination_level;
+ }
+
+
free_tmpmask:
free_cpumask_var(tmpmask);
free_send_covered:
@@ -8027,6 +8061,9 @@ static ssize_t sched_power_savings_store(const char *buf, size_t count, int smt)
else
sched_mc_power_savings = level;
+ active_power_savings_level = max(sched_smt_power_savings,
+ sched_mc_power_savings);
+
arch_reinit_sched_domains();
return count;
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 5cc1c16..bddee3e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ static int wake_idle(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
chosen_wakeup_cpu =
cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu;
- if (sched_mc_power_savings >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP &&
+ if (active_power_savings_level >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP &&
idle_cpu(cpu) && idle_cpu(this_cpu) &&
p->mm && !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) &&
cpu_isset(chosen_wakeup_cpu, p->cpus_allowed))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-16 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-16 16:51 [PATCH 0/3] sched: Extend sched_mc/smt_power_savings framework Gautham R Shenoy
2009-02-16 16:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: code cleanup - sd_power_saving_flags(), sd_balance_for_mc/package_power() Gautham R Shenoy
2009-02-16 17:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 6:55 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-02-16 16:51 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2009-02-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: Fix the wakeup nomination for sched_mc/smt_power_savings Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 17:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 6:59 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-02-16 16:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: Fix sd_parent_degenerate for SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090216165111.12804.41620.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com \
--to=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox