From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753109AbZBQOPi (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:15:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751627AbZBQOP2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:15:28 -0500 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.186]:46674 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751526AbZBQOP1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:15:27 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-disposition:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=HjdGgAUD3lqjwF/lypSuIJHNKkUC/D8BRIdT5jShqKGeh6+IwrcIgrUOAkyFAFzEYN MUkV7bHq4NYIrwwLW4JRHPtoiOdtHx7cZ6q57SFDltynbXPYpNZ1qxXm3vDz6xK6GfDi 09yJnxgYVmYrEVqOww96BWWt9gGtmnIDDfcX4= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ide: add ->dma_expiry method and remove ->dma_exec_cmd one Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:16:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29-rc4-next-20090213; KDE/4.2.0; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20090209231945.32406.14874.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <200902111730.39460.bzolnier@gmail.com> <49930B2D.8090503@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <49930B2D.8090503@ru.mvista.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200902171516.34091.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 11 February 2009, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > >>Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > >>>* Rename dma_timer_expiry() to ide_dma_sff_expiry() and export it. > > >>>* Add ->dma_expiry method > > >> This name doesn't seem to make much sense. Why not leave it dma_timer_expiry? > > > Well, the name matches with hwif->expiry one + the downside of leaving it at > > dma_timer_expiry is a need to reformat all struct ide_dma_ops instances... On the 2nd look it doesn't seem to be a problem (I must have been looking at some odd case previously) -- I'll fix it up later.