From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: etienne <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Linux-Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:52:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902171852.21061.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <499B178B.9090601@numericable.fr>
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 03:01:15 pm etienne wrote:
> I realize this patch is a little ugly, a cleaner way would be to insert
> struct smk_netlbladdr sorted from longest to smallest mask and break the
> loop as soon as we have a match... regards,
Agreed, the address matching code really should be improved; if you feel like
you could contribute the changes I'm pretty sure Casey would welcome the
patches :)
Regarding your fix below, I think a cleaner solution would be to do something
like the following in place of the existing mask check ...
if ((miap->s_addr & bestmask.s_addr) || (bestmask.s_addr == 0)) {
bestmask.s_addr = miap->s_addr;
bestlabel = snp->smk_label;
}
... however there is one small problem with this approach (your proposal
suffers from the same issue): normally the smack_host_label() code prefers the
first matching entry in the list, the change above preserves that with the
exception of a 0.0.0.0/0 entry. Granted, you shouldn't allow that in the
first place but I believe it is possible so it is something that needs to be
taken into consideration.
> Signed-off-by: Etienne <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
> ------
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index 0278bc0..9d2576d 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -1540,7 +1540,7 @@ static char *smack_host_label(struct sockaddr_in
> *sip) * If the list entry mask is less specific than the best * already
> found this entry is uninteresting.
> */
> - if ((miap->s_addr | bestmask.s_addr) == bestmask.s_addr)
> + if ( ((miap->s_addr | bestmask.s_addr) == bestmask.s_addr)
> && (miap->s_addr | bestmask.s_addr) != 0 ) continue;
> /*
> * This is better than any entry found so far.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-security-module" in the body of a message to
> majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-17 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.O38YY4pVfLlMFJNBI3mhgn+qOcQ@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.c87eBVWyCqqi9h1c54QlwKDAIbg@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.f7jv/+EnhNJziduAqQS3XHiU6/A@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.1A5YyyPb1uCn//vnk7baNJGI0IM@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.HFpMNTzIQ1+pODZB3+XkfnipCfo@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.3IBoeBnwT1eZcqeO6DAE1tHBYc4@ifi.uio.no>
2009-02-17 20:01 ` [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match etienne
2009-02-17 20:32 ` [PATCH] SMACK smacklabel : apply &MASK to IP inserted in /smack/netlabel etienne
2009-02-17 23:54 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-18 6:01 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-18 7:25 ` etienne
2009-02-17 22:39 ` [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match David Miller
2009-02-17 23:52 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2009-02-18 7:23 ` etienne
2009-02-18 15:05 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-18 17:09 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-18 19:35 ` etienne
2009-02-18 20:55 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-20 4:36 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-20 18:26 ` etienne
2009-02-18 18:29 ` etienne
2009-02-18 19:06 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-18 21:16 ` [PATCH] SMACK netlabel fixes etienne
2009-02-19 5:50 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-19 15:24 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-19 23:22 ` [PATCH] SMACK netlabel fixes v2 etienne
2009-02-20 16:11 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-18 19:18 ` [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902171852.21061.paul.moore@hp.com \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=etienne.basset@numericable.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox