From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755926AbZBRAyb (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:54:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752432AbZBRAyS (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:54:18 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:58871 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755817AbZBRAyQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:54:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:54:02 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] sysrq: add extension char/table handling Message-ID: <20090218005402.GI25856@elte.hu> References: <4999CDCF.9040908@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4999CDCF.9040908@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Randy Dunlap wrote: > Hi, [repeat from April-2008] > > Ingo noticed that the sysrq table is close to filling up. > [It's full now, counting the optional & proposed/new entries.] > Has anyone thought about how to handle that condition? > > Here's one patch for it, although I'm not entirely thrilled with it. > Any other suggestions? Another option would be to make Shift-SysRq the extension. That way there's a difference between: SysRq-t and SysRq-T. (the former is the usual key, the latter is the extended one.) Ingo