From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Geoff Levand <geoffrey.levand@am.sony.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] tracing/function-graph-tracer: make arch generic push pop functions
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:00:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090218010039.GL25856@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902162346190.30397@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> This patch is to make function graph arch generic. But since
> the PowerPC changes depend on it, we want to push it through
> the PowerPC tree. But since it touches x86 code, can you give
> an Acked-by to it?
hm, but it's all ftrace bits. Could this go through the tracing
tree? That's how it's generally done for most cross-arch
subsystems. By having it in a separate tree we risk conflicts
and various logistics problems. It's not like the PPC tree is
modifying its ftrace.c file all that frequently, right?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-18 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-13 5:23 [PATCH 0/7] [git pull] powerpc function graph tracer Steven Rostedt
2009-02-13 5:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] tracing/function-graph-tracer: make arch generic push pop functions Steven Rostedt
2009-02-17 4:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-18 1:00 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-02-18 1:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-18 3:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-18 3:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-18 12:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 17:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-13 5:24 ` [PATCH 2/7] powerpc64: port of the function graph tracer Steven Rostedt
2009-02-13 5:24 ` [PATCH 3/7] powerpc64, tracing: add function graph tracer with dynamic tracing Steven Rostedt
2009-02-13 5:24 ` [PATCH 4/7] powerpc64, ftrace: save toc only on modules for function graph Steven Rostedt
2009-02-13 5:24 ` [PATCH 5/7] powerpc32, ftrace: save and restore mcount regs with macro Steven Rostedt
2009-02-13 5:24 ` [PATCH 6/7] powerpc32, ftrace: port function graph tracer to ppc32, static only Steven Rostedt
2009-02-13 5:24 ` [PATCH 7/7] powerpc32, ftrace: dynamic function graph tracer Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090218010039.GL25856@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=geoffrey.levand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox