From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754290AbZBRMhr (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:37:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752547AbZBRMhe (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:37:34 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:51450 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751979AbZBRMhd (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:37:33 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:37:14 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jarek Poplawski Cc: David Miller , shemminger@vyatta.com, kaber@trash.net, rick.jones2@hp.com, dada1@cosmosbay.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, gandalf@wlug.westbo.se, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFT 2/4] Add mod_timer_noact Message-ID: <20090218123714.GA28028@elte.hu> References: <20090218110144.GA4100@elte.hu> <20090218113953.GB5408@ff.dom.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090218113953.GB5408@ff.dom.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On 18-02-2009 12:01, Ingo Molnar wrote: > ... > > that straight away. Instead you forced me into wasting time on > > this rather long email (and you also forced the very unnecessary > > public embarrasment of a contributor), for what should have been > > an 'oops, right, will fix' routine matter. > > No problem! But next time use this shorter routine, please... Correct, the "oops, right, will fix" should have come as a reply to my mail, obviously - i did not submit the patch after all. Instead i got this accusatory mail from davem which certainly did not help bring the issue forward ... Thanks, Ingo