From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: etienne <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Linux-Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:18:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902181418.35622.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <499C5377.8050408@numericable.fr>
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 01:29:11 pm etienne wrote:
> OK, I'm about to send a new patch; but while testing my patches and reading
> code, I noticed another bug :
>
> In smackfs.c:smk_write_netlbladdr
> the netmask mask.s_addr is not handled correctly, the netmask should be :
> 1- computed in u32
> 2- converted to be32 !!
> with current code, a "pseudo u32 mask" is applied to a be32 ipaddr; it
> occurs to works for "common netmasks" (multiple of 8), not for
> "intermediate" mask (/15, /25)
Heh, back when Casey was first drafting this code I mentioned the same issue
regarding byte ordering but Casey assured me that everything was correct. I
didn't have a Smack test system at the time so I couldn't verify the behavior.
I'm glad you had a chance to test it, needless to say you should fix that when
you submit your patch.
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-18 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.O38YY4pVfLlMFJNBI3mhgn+qOcQ@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.c87eBVWyCqqi9h1c54QlwKDAIbg@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.f7jv/+EnhNJziduAqQS3XHiU6/A@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.1A5YyyPb1uCn//vnk7baNJGI0IM@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.HFpMNTzIQ1+pODZB3+XkfnipCfo@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.3IBoeBnwT1eZcqeO6DAE1tHBYc4@ifi.uio.no>
2009-02-17 20:01 ` [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match etienne
2009-02-17 20:32 ` [PATCH] SMACK smacklabel : apply &MASK to IP inserted in /smack/netlabel etienne
2009-02-17 23:54 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-18 6:01 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-18 7:25 ` etienne
2009-02-17 22:39 ` [PATCH] SMACK netfilter smacklabel socket match David Miller
2009-02-17 23:52 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-18 7:23 ` etienne
2009-02-18 15:05 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-18 17:09 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-18 19:35 ` etienne
2009-02-18 20:55 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-20 4:36 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-20 18:26 ` etienne
2009-02-18 18:29 ` etienne
2009-02-18 19:06 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-18 21:16 ` [PATCH] SMACK netlabel fixes etienne
2009-02-19 5:50 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-02-19 15:24 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-19 23:22 ` [PATCH] SMACK netlabel fixes v2 etienne
2009-02-20 16:11 ` Paul Moore
2009-02-18 19:18 ` Paul Moore [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902181418.35622.paul.moore@hp.com \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=etienne.basset@numericable.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox