public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca,
	pierre-marc.fournier@polymtl.ca
Subject: Moving Userspace RCU (urcu) from GPL to LGPL license
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:02:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090218180232.GA21389@Krystal> (raw)

Hi Paul,

I think that it would be good to distribute the userspace rcu work we
are currently doing (ref. :
http://lttng.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=userspace-rcu.git) as a
LGPL library rather than GPL so it can be linked to the userspace part
of the LTTng tracer. We want to provide this tracer as a LGPL library so
proprietary applications can link to it and therefore be traceable. The
only thing is that we cannot put GPL code into a LGPL library.

The other point is that I use a few low-level primitives from the Linux
kernel header (e.g. atomic increment for x86, barrier macros). Those are
simple one-liners, but, still, I wonder about the licensing
implications. I could simply "rewrite" them, but that would be a shame
to have a different primitive implementation of those simple primitives
in userspace and in kernel-space just for a licensing question. I would
really like to keep the Linux kernel coding-style within this library.
So the question would be : are those headers, distributed with the Linux
kernel, distributed under GPL license ? Is there any special clause that
would permit using their content under LGPL ? If not, would the
community see such use favorably ?

Ideas/comments are welcome.

Thanks,

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

             reply	other threads:[~2009-02-18 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-18 18:02 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-02-18 20:06 ` Moving Userspace RCU (urcu) from GPL to LGPL license Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-18 20:47   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-18 21:34 ` Alan Cox
2009-02-18 21:44   ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090218180232.GA21389@Krystal \
    --to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltt-dev@lists.casi.polymtl.ca \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pierre-marc.fournier@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox