public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
	mingo@elte.hu, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	acme@ghostprotocols.net, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	compudj@krystal.dyndns.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new irq tracer
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:02:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090218220201.GG24507@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234993580.4799.11.camel@laptop>

Hi -

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:46:20PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> [...]
> How useful is that return value?

"somewhat"?

> Much of the other data is already available, /proc/interrupts will
> happily tell you the source of your interrupt storm. The irq-off
> latency tracer will tell you if stuff takes too much time, the graph
> tracer can tell you what is taking how much time.

Doesn't it seem like this is too much work to have answer a simple if
particular question?

> I really am having a difficult time seeing the use in such narrow
> tracers.

Part of the problem may come from defining "tracers" as something
limited to ftrace engines.  Once such tracepoints are in the kernel,
more powerful analytical tools may be attached to them.


- FChE

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-18 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-18 19:53 [PATCH] new irq tracer Jason Baron
2009-02-18 20:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-18 20:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-19  1:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-18 20:30 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-02-18 21:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-18 21:35   ` Jason Baron
2009-02-18 21:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-18 22:02       ` Frank Ch. Eigler [this message]
2009-02-18 22:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-18 22:23           ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-02-18 23:21             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-20 19:52           ` Jason Baron
2009-02-21  3:39             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-22  3:38             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-25 16:48               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-02-25 16:57                 ` Jason Baron
2009-02-25 17:34                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-25 18:05                     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-25 22:12                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-25 22:20                         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-25 23:13                           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-26  1:41                             ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-26 12:37                               ` Dominique Toupin
2009-02-27  3:14                                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-27  3:29                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-27  3:36                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-27  7:48                                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-27  8:06                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-27  8:13                                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-27 13:10                                           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-02-27 14:43                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-27  7:23                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-25 22:21                         ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-26 15:11                     ` Jason Baron
2009-02-26 15:32                       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-02-26 15:35                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-26 15:40                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-26 16:20                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-27  3:35                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-27  3:33                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-27  7:25                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-25 16:58                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-25 17:19                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-02-27  3:08                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-18 23:34       ` Kyle McMartin
2009-02-19  2:13       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-19  1:46   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090218220201.GG24507@redhat.com \
    --to=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox