From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: tom.leiming@gmail.com
Cc: kay.sievers@vrfy.org, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com,
arjan@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RESEND] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe_done(v3)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:07:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090219000748.GC5181@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234882444-6862-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>
This conflicts with a patch from Arjan in this same area that I've now
applied to my tree (used to be in the -mm tree).
Care to rebase it on the next linux-next release?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:54:04PM +0800, tom.leiming@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
>
> This patch adds a function : driver_wait_probe_done,
> which waits on condition of probing done to replace
> polling for driver_probe_done in fs initialization.
>
> There is no better way to avoid polling for
> driver_probe_done _and_ existence of the root device,
> so we does not replace the driver_probe_done with
> driver_wait_probe_done in such special case.
>
> Removing polling in fs initialization may lead to
> a faster boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/dd.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> include/linux/device.h | 1 +
> init/do_mounts.c | 4 ++--
> init/do_mounts_md.c | 3 +--
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 9b721d3..8f9f6fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,18 @@ int driver_probe_done(void)
> }
>
> /**
> + * driver_wait_probe_done
> + * Wait until the probe sequence is finished.
> + *
> + */
> +void driver_wait_probe_done(void)
> +{
> + pr_debug("%s: probe_count = %d\n", __func__,
> + atomic_read(&probe_count));
> + wait_event(probe_waitqueue, atomic_read(&probe_count) == 0);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * driver_probe_device - attempt to bind device & driver together
> * @drv: driver to bind a device to
> * @dev: device to try to bind to the driver
> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> index 45e5b19..c53cdbf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ extern void put_driver(struct device_driver *drv);
> extern struct device_driver *driver_find(const char *name,
> struct bus_type *bus);
> extern int driver_probe_done(void);
> +extern void driver_wait_probe_done(void);
>
> /* sysfs interface for exporting driver attributes */
>
> diff --git a/init/do_mounts.c b/init/do_mounts.c
> index 708105e..9cb1985 100644
> --- a/init/do_mounts.c
> +++ b/init/do_mounts.c
> @@ -371,8 +371,8 @@ void __init prepare_namespace(void)
> }
>
> /* wait for the known devices to complete their probing */
> - while (driver_probe_done() != 0)
> - msleep(100);
> + driver_wait_probe_done();
> +
> async_synchronize_full();
>
> md_run_setup();
> diff --git a/init/do_mounts_md.c b/init/do_mounts_md.c
> index ff95e31..63b77f0 100644
> --- a/init/do_mounts_md.c
> +++ b/init/do_mounts_md.c
> @@ -281,8 +281,7 @@ static void __init autodetect_raid(void)
> */
> printk(KERN_INFO "md: Waiting for all devices to be available before autodetect\n");
> printk(KERN_INFO "md: If you don't use raid, use raid=noautodetect\n");
> - while (driver_probe_done() < 0)
> - msleep(100);
> + driver_wait_probe_done();
> fd = sys_open("/dev/md0", 0, 0);
> if (fd >= 0) {
> sys_ioctl(fd, RAID_AUTORUN, raid_autopart);
> --
> 1.6.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-19 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-17 14:54 [PATCH/RESEND] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe_done(v3) tom.leiming
2009-02-19 0:07 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090219000748.GC5181@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox