public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
	roland@redhat.com, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	daniel@hozac.com, Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7][v8] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:06:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090219030637.GD18990@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090219030207.GA18783@us.ibm.com>


From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 14:03:57 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 4/7][v8] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals

Drop early any SIG_DFL or SIG_IGN signals to container-init from within
the same container. But queue SIGSTOP and SIGKILL to the container-init
if they are from an ancestor container.

Blocked, fatal signals (i.e when SIG_DFL is to terminate) from within the
container can still terminate the container-init. That will be addressed
in the next patch.

Note:	To be bisect-safe, SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will be set for container-inits
   	in a follow-on patch. Until then, this patch is just a preparatory
	step.

Changelog[v7]:
	- (Oleg Nesterov) Bugfix: send_sigqueue() should use from_ancestor_ns=0
	- siginfo_from_user(), siginfo_from_ancestor_ns() are needed in only
	  one place.  Remove them and move their logic into send_signal().
	  Seems to make code more easier to read :-)

Changelog[v6]:
	- (Roland McGrath) Remove unnecessary helper signal_task_unkillable()
	  and fold checks into sig_task_ignored().

Changelog[v4]:
	- (Oleg Nesterov) Remove SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE_FROM_NS and rename
	  'same_ns' to 'from_ancestor_ns'.
	- SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE is not yet set for container-inits (will be
	  set in follow-on patch).

Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/signal.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index ff1dff9..a3a1304 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -55,20 +55,21 @@ static int sig_handler_ignored(void __user *handler, int sig)
 		(handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
 }
 
-static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
+static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig,
+		int from_ancestor_ns)
 {
 	void __user *handler;
 
 	handler = sig_handler(t, sig);
 
 	if (unlikely(t->signal->flags & SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE) &&
-			handler == SIG_DFL)
+			handler == SIG_DFL && !from_ancestor_ns)
 		return 1;
 
 	return sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig);
 }
 
-static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
+static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, int from_ancestor_ns)
 {
 	/*
 	 * Blocked signals are never ignored, since the
@@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
 	if (sigismember(&t->blocked, sig) || sigismember(&t->real_blocked, sig))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!sig_task_ignored(t, sig))
+	if (!sig_task_ignored(t, sig, from_ancestor_ns))
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -634,7 +635,7 @@ static int check_kill_permission(int sig, struct siginfo *info,
  * Returns true if the signal should be actually delivered, otherwise
  * it should be dropped.
  */
-static int prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p)
+static int prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, int from_ancestor_ns)
 {
 	struct signal_struct *signal = p->signal;
 	struct task_struct *t;
@@ -718,7 +719,7 @@ static int prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p)
 		}
 	}
 
-	return !sig_ignored(p, sig);
+	return !sig_ignored(p, sig, from_ancestor_ns);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -832,7 +833,8 @@ static int __send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
 	trace_sched_signal_send(sig, t);
 
 	assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
-	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t))
+
+	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, from_ancestor_ns))
 		return 0;
 
 	pending = group ? &t->signal->shared_pending : &t->pending;
@@ -902,7 +904,15 @@ out_set:
 static int send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
 			int group)
 {
-	return __send_signal(sig, info, t, group, 0);
+	int from_ancestor_ns = 0;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PID_NS
+	if (!is_si_special(info) && SI_FROMUSER(info) &&
+			task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(t)) <= 0)
+		from_ancestor_ns = 1;
+#endif
+
+	return __send_signal(sig, info, t, group, from_ancestor_ns);
 }
 
 int print_fatal_signals;
@@ -1336,7 +1346,7 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *t, int group)
 		goto ret;
 
 	ret = 1; /* the signal is ignored */
-	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t))
+	if (!prepare_signal(sig, t, 0))
 		goto out;
 
 	ret = 0;
-- 
1.5.2.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-19  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-19  3:02 [PATCH 0/7][v8] Container-init signal semantics Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19  3:05 ` [PATCH 1/7][v8] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19  3:05 ` [PATCH 2/7][v8] Protect init from unwanted signals more Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19  3:06 ` [PATCH 3/7][v8] Add from_ancestor_ns parameter to send_signal() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19  3:06 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu [this message]
2009-02-19  3:07 ` [PATCH 5/7][v8] zap_pid_ns_process() should use force_sig() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19 18:59   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-19 20:26     ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19  3:07 ` [PATCH 6/7][v8] Protect cinit from blocked fatal signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19  3:07 ` [PATCH 7/7][v8] SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-19 16:11   ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-19 18:51     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-19 22:18       ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-19 22:31         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-19 23:21           ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-19 23:51             ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-20  0:35               ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20  1:06                 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-20  2:12                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20  3:10                     ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-20  4:05                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20  0:28             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-20  1:16               ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-19 14:59 ` [PATCH 0/7][v8] Container-init signal semantics Daniel Lezcano
2009-03-07 19:04   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-07 19:43     ` Daniel Lezcano
2009-03-07 19:51       ` Greg Kurz
2009-03-07 19:59         ` Daniel Lezcano
2009-02-19 20:53 ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090219030637.GD18990@us.ibm.com \
    --to=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=daniel@hozac.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox