From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758456AbZBSU5r (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:57:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755506AbZBSU53 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:57:29 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:46013 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755484AbZBSU53 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:57:29 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:53:55 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Andrew Morton , roland@redhat.com, "Eric W. Biederman" , daniel@hozac.com, Containers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][v8] Container-init signal semantics Message-ID: <20090219205355.GC374@redhat.com> References: <20090219030207.GA18783@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090219030207.GA18783@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/18, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > > Patch 5/7 is new in this set and fixes a bug. To clarify, the current code is buggy, and the fix doesn't depend on any other patch, afaics. > Remaining patches are > just a forward-port from previous version and I believe they address > all comments I have received. > > Oleg please sign-off/ack if you agree. Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov