Re: [PATCH 0/7][v8] Container-init signal semantics

Daniel Lezcano
2009-03-07T20:00:16Z

Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 20:43 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
>> case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_HALT:
>> - kernel_halt();
>> - unlock_kernel();
>> - do_exit(0);
>> + if (power_off_pid_ns(current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
>> + kernel_halt();
>> + unlock_kernel();
>> + do_exit(0);
>> + }
>>
>
> Even if current will get SIGKILLed when zap_pid_ns_processes() is
> called, I see no reason it doesn't call do_exit(0).
Right and unlock_kernel too :)
>
>> break;
>>
>> case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_POWER_OFF:
>> - kernel_power_off();
>> - unlock_kernel();
>> - do_exit(0);
>> + if (power_off_pid_ns(current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
>> + kernel_power_off();
>> + unlock_kernel();
>> + do_exit(0);
>> + }
>>
>
> Same.
>
>
>> break;
>>
>>