Re: [PATCH 0/7][v8] Container-init signal semantics

Greg Kurz
2009-03-07T19:52:10Z

On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 20:43 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_HALT:
> - kernel_halt();
> - unlock_kernel();
> - do_exit(0);
> + if (power_off_pid_ns(current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
> + kernel_halt();
> + unlock_kernel();
> + do_exit(0);
> + }

Even if current will get SIGKILLed when zap_pid_ns_processes() is
called, I see no reason it doesn't call do_exit(0).

> break;
>
> case LINUX_REBOOT_CMD_POWER_OFF:
> - kernel_power_off();
> - unlock_kernel();
> - do_exit(0);
> + if (power_off_pid_ns(current->nsproxy->pid_ns)) {
> + kernel_power_off();
> + unlock_kernel();
> + do_exit(0);
> + }

Same.

> break;
>
--
Gregory Kurz gkurz@fr.ibm.com
Software Engineer @ IBM/Meiosys http://www.ibm.com
Tel +33 (0)534 638 479 Fax +33 (0)561 400 420

"Anarchy is about taking complete responsibility for yourself."
Alan Moore.