public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcie_portdriver: FIX: pcie_port_device_remove
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:53:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902201153.52683.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m13aeaxaw0.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

On Friday 20 February 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> 
> > On Thursday 19 February 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> >
> >> > There are large-scale and conflicting changes to this file in linux-next.
> >> >
> >> > If we want to jam this fix into 2.6.29 (and it looks like something we
> >> > want) then this will trash the linux-next changes.  It will cause me
> >> > grief, and will cause Stephen grief unless the pci tree is suitably
> >> > changed, which will cause Jesse grief. Either way: grief.
> >> 
> >> Ugh.
> >> 
> >> I had better have a good hard look at linux-next.  I tried to ask earlier
> > about
> >> ongoing working but I didn't hear anything.
> >
> > Yes, you did: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123342565225134&w=4
> 
> My apologies.

No problem. :-)

Rafael

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-20 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-14  4:23 [PATCH] pcie_portdriver: FIX: pcie_port_device_remove Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-19 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-19 20:55   ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-19 21:47     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-19 23:30       ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-19 23:53         ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-20 10:53         ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2009-02-21  4:16           ` [PATCH] pcie_portdriver: FIX: pcie_port_device_remove (take 2) Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-24 19:12             ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-25  4:22               ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200902201153.52683.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox