From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759728AbZBTRhq (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:37:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759937AbZBTRgp (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:36:45 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:35488 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757150AbZBTRgo (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:36:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:36:37 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett To: Scott James Remnant Cc: Ingo Molnar , davej@codemonkey.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Change link order of x86 cpufreq modules Message-ID: <20090220173637.GA1985@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20090218182822.GA19902@srcf.ucam.org> <20090218183137.GD26802@elte.hu> <20090218183641.GA20203@srcf.ucam.org> <1235150992.6467.66.camel@quest> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1235150992.6467.66.camel@quest> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vavatch.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:29:52PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote: > In fact, we've noticed severe regressions with p4-clockmod over simply > having no scaling driver at all - and are not going to built it into our > kernels. It makes sense to have p4-clockmod from a thermal management perspective. We should probably bump its transition latency to more than 10ms to prevent ondemand binding to it. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org